Originally posted by Tptmanno1
i hate so called "classics" the're never any good.
I don't know if you really are a ****ing idiot, but statements like that can only lead me to one conclusion: you are.
You just dismissed thousands of years of literature in nine words. Get your head out from between your legs, moron.
Originally posted by Ytse
Atlas ShruggedSorry, I know lots of people love Ayn Rand and think it's intelligent to read this dry, dry tome. But I couldn't cope after 100 pages.
It's one of the most important books in post-war American history. That being said...a good 300 pages could've been shaved off and the same moral lesson would've been achieved.
The movie is going to completely ****ing bomb, though. How are they going to edit Galt's 80-page speech? That alone would take up three hours!
Originally posted by Ytse
Atlas ShruggedSorry, I know lots of people love Ayn Rand and think it's intelligent to read this dry, dry tome. But I couldn't cope after 100 pages.
Page 950 to 1000 hurt pretty bad...but the rest was very smooth sailing. Great book. The Fountainhead is much easier and more fun to read though.
Originally posted by RaventheOnlyN-no morals? Did you understand a word she wrote?
I 2nd Atlas Shrugged... omg its such a retarded story and talk about no morals O.o
Originally posted by enjoyyrworries
Vonnegut's Breakfast of Champions is the worst book I've ever attempted. His pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-satirical, arrogant hipster mentality and style are unbearable.Also, any of Bukowski's poetry.
bukowski is a one trick pony. never understood how he became so firmly entrenched in the literary canon.
i'm not the biggest vonnegut fan, but cat's cradle , welcome to the monkey house , and slaughterhouse-five are all quite good. especially cat's cradle.
when i was younger i would always sneak twain into the vonnegut section of the bookstore, as a private joke.
Originally posted by manorastroman
bukowski is a one trick pony. never understood how he became so firmly entrenched in the literary canon.i'm not the biggest vonnegut fan, but cat's cradle , welcome to the monkey house , and slaughterhouse-five are all quite good. especially cat's cradle.
when i was younger i would always sneak twain into the vonnegut section of the bookstore, as a private joke.
Bukowski's a joke. He's a dime-store Fante.
I've read both Slaughterhouse-Five and Cat's Cradle, trying so hard to like them (in high school right now Vonnegut is the big literary fad. I guess Palahniuk or however the hell you spell his name is loosing ground. He's just as bad.), but I just don't get it, for the reasons already mentioned.
cat's cradle struck me as allegory, so the parallels i invented made it very rich indeed. slaughterhouse-five i can understand not enjoying.
palahniuk is bad. i read fight club roundabout six or seven years ago, thought it was neat, and i've disliked him slightly more every single day since. i prefer easton ellis, will self, or jg ballard when it comes to the transgressives.
Artemis Fowl first book is actually boring, i means boring-o, but if u read whole series, u will say its amazing, but who have tolerances with read boring book, i do, most time i will leave that book in storage box for 2 years, then i find it again, and force myself to read whole book.... just like Eldest, its good book but impossible to done whole book in one day, it will kill me! LOL
Originally posted by zeldaboyz
i will say its Catcher in the Rye, i dont understand what that book abt, i dont understand it, i dont want to read it all over again, most worst book i ever read in my life, yes, i actually did tore that book up and threw it away in trash long time ago, LOL! 😄
How.....proletarian of you.