Jar-Jar was never meant to be deep or anything... He's supposed to be comic relief.
Then all of a sudden all the fanboys start jumpin' up and down and complaining beacuse they got 16 years old and Star Wars didn't grow up with them.
I wish they would just get over it! Star Wars is, after all, just a movie!!!
Jar Jar is a digital cartoon. So what?! If you never watched cartoons at some point in your life, there's something wrong with you.
Jar Jar strikes me as more of a Looney Toon than a Disney character. Every toon fan knows Warner Brothers kicks Disney's prissy face ta Hell. After Walt died, Disney became a training camp for enviro-commies, globalists, and jack-booted government thug-supporters. Everything had to have some kind of hidden propaganda message. Disney isn't the one one, either.
Ferngully and Captain Planet are two examples of what I'm talking about. Batty was alright, even if Robin Williams is a communist system-lacky. Captain Planet has no redeeming qualities whatsoever except that some of the villians were at least quasi-creative. When I was younger, back when that crap show was on, I actually rooted for the villians. And another thing, it promotes false religion with Gaia, the Spirit of the Earth, making weak-minded kids believe the god of the universe is a black woman.
Look what political-correctness has done to the world. Thanks to the social institution of indoctrination and conditioning, Jar Jar is seen as a racist figure, which he isn't. Some system-lackies have even suggested that all the Gungans, along with other Star Wars aliens, are racist figures. If this is true (and this is hypothetical), and the Gungans really do represent Black people, then what about Jar Jar? He was banished from his own kind after all. He wasn't just banished from Otoh Gunga, he was banished from Gungankind, declared "not a true Gungan." So then, he has no kind. Therefore, he couldn't possibly represent Black people or any other race of people. Jar Jar represents the quintessential outsider - the social pariah.
That is a very fair comment.
If people can recognise what GL was trying to achive byt feel he failed then I can respect that.
What I can't respect is those who say that Jar-Jar had no place in Star Wars when clearly he did.
The character was there is achieve certain things, link up the Jedi with the Gungans, Link up the Naboo with the Gungans. This he did.
Not liking him because of the way he acted is a reasonable thing, but those who say he was worthless to the plot just don't get the story.
I applaud you evaluation Yerssot, it goes a long way to proving that you DID understand.🙂
Like finti said in another thread: Belgium boy aint that smart
I don't have anything against the acting style of Ahmed Best, or the language.
If you leave the "'funny"' stuff out of it, Jar Jar is just an ordinary character that is digitally created.
Why don't people react the same way on Watto? Because he plays an ordinary role, and he does it whitout the 'funny' stuff