Poll
14%
14%
24%
48%
I think the storyline was somewhat compromised for the over-the-top gore level... it could have been so much more, especially with the caliber of acting talent in the movie. It was amazing to see how many people actually left the theater on this one. Still, I wouldn't call the movie bad... it was one of Paul Anderson's better directorial efforts.
I watched it again the other night, and i realized that the total lump of sh*te that is Ghost Ship is almost exactly the same.
Both ships vanish.
Both ships are located fifteen years later.
Both ships have salvagers go to them.
Both ships have an evil presence on board them.
There are more things, but i can't be assed to write them here 😖leep:
I watched it again the other night, and i realized that the total lump of sh*te that is Ghost Ship is almost exactly the same.
I watched it again the other night, and i realized that the total lump of sh*te that is Ghost Ship is almost exactly the same.
Both ships vanish.
Both ships are located fifteen years later.
Both ships have salvagers go to them.
Both ships have an evil presence on board them.
I totally totally disagree that they are similar. The vague points you refer to could be strewn across hoardes of horror movies. "Both ships have an evil presence" ? LOL Well its a horror movie, of course they do.
1. Both ships vanished, but Ghost Ship went adrift and was never heard from again, Event Horizon attempted subspacial travel and went to another dimension. not quite the same.
2. Event horizon wasn't quite 15 years later, and ghost ship was over 40 years later.
3. Ghost Ship had salvagers driven by money and greed to get the ship. Event horizon they were basically forced to go back out there, for a bit more money on a rescue and research mission.
4. its horror, theres evil, 😄
All in all, honestly I liked ghost ship, the whole thing, start to finish. And I loved event horizon. I think they could do a leetsauce sequel to it with fishburne as a nasty baddie.