Ethical Situation...

Free the innocent crook.

You are all forgetting that if you don't free the crook you can't arrest the true murderer.

This question it isn't an ethical question since the moment you let a murderer be free only to prossecute your personal vengeance.

At that moment you are involved at the murder that you want the crook to be punish.

Better to arrest yourself too after destroy the letter.

😛

How about if I destroy the letter to send the dealer down, then find out who really did the murder and frame them for another crime instead? 😛

😂 now that's a plan 😉

The best way should be arrest you or half of the city would be arrested only to satisfy yourself 😛

hehe

The real murderer confesed to the crime, then killed himself! 😛

Ahhhh, all's well that ends well. 😄

nice! 😂

* Dusts off hands *

My job here is done.

Closing......

😉

noooo *overdramatic pose...with some tears in eyes like so---->*

😛

Then again, there is always

''Shoot them all and let the God sort them out'' approach....😕

I would let the scumbag go free because if I don't I will be reduced to his level, I would become a criminal and is me that I have to live with. This is one of the reasons I'm not a policeman.

Lil'one, this is an excellent thread, you get a brownie point for that.

I'd just destroy the evidence and convict the guy. To hell with you people and you're stuff about God. I'm athiest and proud. And a twisted person. 🙂

Originally posted by Vader
I would let the scumbag go free because if I don't I will be reduced to his level, I would become a criminal and is me that I have to live with. This is one of the reasons I'm not a policeman.

Lil'one, this is an excellent thread, you get a brownie point for that.

mmmmmmmmmmmm a brownie *drool*

Thank you 😄