!
Nazgul, do I seriousay have to refute that half-baked argument? That argument with no sense or reason behind it? Have you read the books? Do I have to point out that Tom ios not a servant of the Dark but clearly referred to as otherwise? Do I have to point out that in all of Tolkien's writings Tom is conceptually different to anything approaching the Witch-King? Do I have to point out that the Witch-King was busy and accounted for during the time that Frodo meets him in the book? Do I have to point out that the Barrow Wights are under his power because they are inside his own domain? Do I have to point out that he was not acting like the Witch-King, without the motivations of the Witch-King, and not doing what the Witch-King would have done i.e. taken the Ring from Frodo and CERTAINLY not saved Frodo's life twice, one time from the Barrow Wights? Do I have to point out that the Witch-King has no physical form,. and nor would he be immune to the power of the Ring, as is rather evident?
Or shall I just repeat the evidence of most stupendous obviousness that shoots this down before it even starts? The Witch-King was a MORTAL MAN, contemporary to the end ot the Second Age.
Tom Bombadil is SEVERAL times referred to as pre-dating the entire Elven race and the First Age. So it is rampantly impossible.
Geez, I do not believe I just had to do that. That this idea could have taken serious hold in anyone's mind shakes my faith in the mindset of fans.