Final Destination 2

Started by Lord Soth4 pages

Poor Rory. It was funny as hell though 😆

haha yea but the intestines kinda grossed me out (fiest time good job FD2!)

Final Destination 2

I thought this movie was great , i love how everything works out in regaurds to the kids deaths after the preminision, like when their in the car and the gasoline leaks and when it explodes the bared wire goes through the guy, and how at the end its like its not over and death is still after them. it was a great movie.

it sucked

it wasnt as good as #1 but ii dont think it sucked thats my opinion anyway

Originally posted by Aini
it sucked

I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually ELABORATE why I liked the movie! 😱

I liked Final Destination 2 because the cast was a lot more tolerable than the previous one, especially with Devon Sawa out of the picture, having been killed, thankfully, between 1 + 2.

I also enjoyed 2 because of the randomization of the deaths. That way, nobody can use the tired "it was so predictible" excuse. Not even the fact that everyone was going to die would be applicable here, because not all of them did, and the ones you expected to, did not.

The special effects were even better this time around, as was the extreme nature of the "accidents", and of course, the gore. There were some rather uncredible deaths, however, i.e. being crushed by a thin pane of glass?

All in all, I enjoyed it throughly, and I still think that along with Scream, Final Destination is one of the more original and entertaining franchises to come along in the past decade, which has been full of more teen horror crap then I'd like to mention.

I realize that it may be the opinion of others that the movie didn't interest them, but next time, how about explaining why? I like to talk about movies. Not interject random, 2 word opinions and call it a day.
🙄

alright, explanation:
everything in that movie exploded. (kinda like at the simpsons where even a slide explodes). the car crash at the beginning and the boy at the end, was kinda stupid and I didn't like that. I'm not a big fan of fire (to say the truth I'm terrified of it, it's a phobia i guess) and I can't stand watching ppl burn.
also I don't really like the story of both films. It say (for me), don't save anybodys live cause they're suppose to die anyways.

Its a really good movie and CA your right its one of the most original franchises in a long time which is kind of sad

i thought this movie was good..i like the ending better in this one then the first one..

Yeah me too 😉

awesome.. 😛

yeah 😄

Out of respect to everyone in this thread, reserve the chit chat for PM's, so we can stay on topic, save the 2 words replies.

Thanks. 😄

Good movie 😄

if its anything like the first one then it's gonna be shit. the first one was crappy, i didn't like it at all. it was "horror moive by numbers" as far as i am concerned, nothing amazing about it at all.

Err, "Final Destination" is like no other horror movie, vice versa, and don't bother commenting if you haven't seen the 2nd one.

You'll fall under the "cinematically prejudical" category, along with my buddy Vengeance, and he doesn't keep very good company.

"Cinematically prejudical" big words im having trouble keeping along 😕

Yeah if you havent seen the second dont bother posting in this thread 😉

Originally posted by Stormeister
"Cinematically prejudical" big words im having trouble keeping along 😕

Judging a movie before seeing it. Not too hard to decipher.

I loved the first FD. The second one was really bad in my opinion. It hasn't ruined it enough for me to see the third one when it comes out.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
You'll fall under the "cinematically prejudical" category, along with my buddy Vengeance, and he doesn't keep very good company.

by saying he dosn't keep good company and your his friends, are you saying your bad company 😉

and i watched FD2 yesterday and i can honestly say i want my money back. while it was well shot, the special effects were good and whatever, the movie still sucked arse. while i disagre with backfire or evil dead (i cant remember who) said that it went against the first movie, they do actually talk about why there in the situation they're in, how the people who should have died affected other peoples lives and altered deaths list now deaths connecting the loose ends.
but it is so damn over the top, i'm a fan of friday the 13th, jason CANT DIE, but i still find this movie to much over the top. at the start in the preminition the guy falls off his motorbike, and it goes shooting off to the side. then you see him sliding along with the bike back behind him, where it smashed into him with a splat and a spray of blood.
now you turn on ESPN and see Troy Baelis come off of a 500cc superbike at 200 km/h slides across the ground and into a wall, bouncing all over the place, then get up and walk away, a bike wouldn't do that to you.
the kid getting splatted by the pane of glass also gave me the shits, a human wouldn't simply disolve like that, and the glass would have simply sliced the shit out of him and smashed on him (killing his, but not spraying him like that).
mr black "know all about death man." as randomly as the first one, simply is found, and with no questions, starts babbling about death and all its details. why does he know so much? where did he come from? why is he helping them? these questions arn't even glanced apon in the movie, and it makes it that damn annoying that i wanted to turn off. but i didn't i watched it all so i could comment.
well theres my rant