Korri>im just reading his review of Revolutions...
"I'm not convinced that this adds anything to the 1999 film, which was remarkable for its freshness and imagination. Moreover, the dialogue and the cod philosophy in evidence here makes the first third of this movie pretty heavy going for all but the hardened Matrix zealot, and there's no emotional depth or drive of the kind which would make this a truly stirring epic."
id say it does add alot to the series but obviously the more of a 'hardened Matrix zealot' you are the more you will like it.
"Redeeming features include the scale and quality of the battle scenes, while the slightly inconclusive ending is far more daring than I had come to expect, translating the complexity of high quality fiction into that most mundane of modern cinema genres, the big budget action movie."
"Had Reloaded and Revolutions been condensed into one film, I believe we'd now have a Matrix sequel which could stand the test of time alongside the original. As it is, the result is three visually stunning movies which display huge amounts of imagination but which don't sustain their fairly thin basic premise."
yeah 2+3 would be more popular if they were judged as one film.
surely a good premise that is expanded upon?
The Matrix Revolutions can be seen nationwide now. Striking and impressive in many ways, but ultimately one for the fans"
fair comment...?