2005 Movies

Started by trav661221 pages

I agree the batman movies went downhill from the start, although the second batman was pretty good other than that they started going to the crapper.

Originally posted by vaya_the_elf
is anyone excited about batman begins?

Completely because they are going to do everything they never did in a Batman film before. They will actually show how Bruce Wayne became Batman which will be worth watching it alone the rest is just cool extras.

I have faith in bale. He is a great actor. He has proved that he can have both a dark and heoric persona to him.

I am so hoping that Batman Begins can pull it off for 2005. With no X-Men 3 in sight, I am desperate. Pathetic, but desperate! πŸ˜‚

I hear there are big problems for X-men 3 since singer left. He was the one keeping berry and jackman interested in returning. I kind of lost respect for singer. I mean yeah okay he wants to go to other movies and expand his abilities. However he left x-men for another comic book movie. not much expanding of abilities is going to happen here. It is the same genre and style of filmaking. Singer started the x-men with plans of always having three films. Fans anticipated X-2 so much because of singers return of directing. Fans are also looking forward to X-3, a film singer promised his fans. They are looking forward to another X-men movie to see the characters and style of filmaking and respect Singer gave the X-men, but no singer left Marvel to go to the Arch enemy D.C to make superman. What an ass goblin.

Well if Jackman and Berry arent secured, that another comic book franchise down the tube. The movie im looking forward to is Star Wars epIII, yet with Lucas.. i have that sinking feeling again..

Yeah, that does suck, I liked singer. He did a good job with Xmen and I want to see X-3 so bad.

i heard that kevin smith is doing passion of clerks

What is that about?

Originally posted by trav6612
I agree the batman movies went downhill from the start, although the second batman was pretty good other than that they started going to the crapper.

The 2nd one was every bit as awful as Batman and Robin.We NEED BATMAN BEGINS because ALL the Batman movies sucked in one way or another.Unlike Batman 89,I am excited about BATMAN BEGINS because Bale is actually perfect for the role because unlike Keaton, he is physically right for the role.I am excited about Batman Begins and Elecktra as well as Hitchhikers.Huge mistake allowing Burton to make Charlie and the chocolate factory.Burton will screw up that movie the same way he screwed up the batman movies. 😠

Burton diddnt screw up Batman. Infact he gave us the greatest comic movie (batman). No one will be able to give us a better batman than Keaton. I know Bale is a very good actor,but he wont be able to pul it off with the cool slickness keaton had.

Yeah SMith is doing another clerks movie, but it will be Clerks;sellout

Hate to break the news to you but Burton screwed it up BIG TIME.More like one of the worst comicbook movies ever.Superman still holds that honor of best comicbook movie ever.No contest.sorry to break your heart but Kilmer was a much better Batman than Keaton and Batman Forever is the best Batman movie of the 4.Hands down,no contest. πŸ˜› Burton should NEVER have been allowed near a batman movie because he made the worst casting choice in comicbook history casting pudgy gut,receding hairline,half bald,short runt Michael keaton for tall,muscular,handsome,full set of hair Bruce wayne.it was a joke,it was like watching AL bundy walking around bruce wayne manor, a pathectic joke.At least Nolan unlike Burton cares about bringing the best possible choice for the role of Batman casting Bale who is physically right for the role.

I didint know that being a goofy idiot forgeting the places in his own house , being a terrible figher and being a supporting character was called cool slickness.

By the way, im hoping for batman begins, fantastic four, and specially king kong for 2005.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Hate to break the news to you but Burton screwed it up BIG TIME.More like one of the worst comicbook movies ever.Superman still holds that honor of best comicbook movie ever.No contest.sorry to break your heart but Kilmer was a much better Batman than Keaton and Batman Forever is the best Batman movie of the 4.Hands down,no contest. πŸ˜› Burton should NEVER have been allowed near a batman movie because he made the worst casting choice in comicbook history casting pudgy gut,receding hairline,half bald,short runt Michael keaton for tall,muscular,handsome,full set of hair Bruce wayne.it was a joke,it was like watching AL bundy walking around bruce wayne manor, a pathectic joke.At least Nolan unlike Burton cares about bringing the best possible choice for the role of Batman casting Bale who is physically right for the role.

No i hate to break it to break it to YOU. Batman was an incredible movie, very faithfull to the comics, aside from a few inconsistancies. It embodied the darkness behind Batman and not to mention it created a very vivid atmosphere for the city of Gotham which was done very well.
Burton created some spectacular art and set designs that gave Batman life on film all on it's own. The concept of making the shadows in the movie a character was a very brilliant elaboration to batmans character. The cinematography of the Film was amazing and memorable. Burtons desire to also make the music of the film the definition of Batman turned out to be astonishing and suspensful. Burton went to great measures to secure danny elfman on the project, and worked with him. The cast of the film was very on key, every character in the film was acted out with great talent that fit just right into the characters persona as you would expect them to be. Keaton made batman a real person, instead of a plain tunnel visioned character. Yes it is of the very best comic adaptations to date, it rivals and is arguably better than the very slow paced Superman. Critics and fans alike acknowledge the original as being the best

As for Batman forever, i dont know what the hell that was. It was a circus on film. With extreme over acting by jim carey, and underacting by kilmer, the characters were destroyed. Batman forever was extremely over the top trying to re-produce the visual quality of the originals,but failed miserably distorted eye candy. Instead of making Batman a believable and subtle Hero, he was turned into a train wreck that more resembled the orginal campy t.v series of inside jokes, than the comic book version of the dark knight.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
No i hate to break it to break it to YOU. Batman was an incredible movie, very faithfull to the comics, aside from a few inconsistancies. It embodied the darkness behind Batman and not to mention it created a very vivid atmosphere for the city of Gotham which was done very well.
Burton created some spectacular art and set designs that gave Batman life on film all on it's own. The concept of making the shadows in the movie a character was a very brilliant elaboration to batmans character. The cinematography of the Film was amazing and memorable. Burtons desire to also make the music of the film the definition of Batman turned out to be astonishing and suspensful. Burton went to great measures to secure danny elfman on the project, and worked with him. The cast of the film was very on key, every character in the film was acted out with great talent that fit just right into the characters persona as you would expect them to be. Keaton made batman a real person, instead of a plain tunnel visioned character. Yes it is of the very best comic adaptations to date, it rivals and is arguably better than the very slow paced Superman. Critics and fans alike acknowledge the original as being the best

As for Batman forever, i dont know what the hell that was. It was a circus on film. With extreme over acting by jim carey, and underacting by kilmer, the characters were destroyed. Batman forever was extremely over the top trying to re-produce the visual quality of the originals,but failed miserably distorted eye candy. Instead of making Batman a believable and subtle Hero, he was turned into a train wreck that more resembled the orginal campy t.v series of inside jokes, than the comic book version of the dark knight.

I agree fully βœ… Burton brought it to life and the acting was awesome.... Jack Nicholson was undoubtably played the best villian in any comic adaptation ever.

And God the music was brilliant.

Originally posted by bakerboy
I didint know that being a goofy idiot forgeting the places in his own house , being a terrible figher and being a supporting character was called cool slickness.

Well said.Yeah if thats cool slickness,thats news to me. πŸ˜†

Originally posted by RaventheOnly
I agree fully βœ… Burton brought it to life and the acting was awesome.... Jack Nicholson was undoubtably played the best villian in any comic adaptation ever.

And God the music was brilliant.

I would agree that Burton made Batman good, the darkness is definetly a sign of the mystery behind batman and Jack was awesome as the joker. I hope Batman begins can bring batman back into good standing cause the last ones were circus train wrecks.

most of them

I think burton will do a good job with Charlie and the chocolate factory, plus with Johnney Deep it will be one of the best movies of 2005