Originally posted by WindDancer
Bah! Just kick the ol' hag into the street! The only thing she's good at is to throw dinners for foreign diplomats and wearing a crown.Heck, if wearing a crown makes them so important....I think I'll go to London and wear one myself. 😉
Of course there goes the typical rude American! Making an ass of himself. 😛
The Queen still has powers, but she's handed over the majority of them to Parliament
she still has the power to claim ANY piece of land as hers, so she can turn up on ur doorstep and kick u out, no questions.
theres a few more but i cant remember em
oh and its a symbol of tradition, and Britain is really big on tradition lol 💃
Originally posted by dean7879
not if the bnp have somethin to do with it...they are a sick rascist group
The BNP might not like it, but the more extreme right wing parties such as the WNP should be happy - they seem to have points in common with Islamic schools of thought; take rabid homophobia or transient fantasies of a Jewish conspiracy!
Let's place bets on how many newspapers will yet again claim "We have the best chance of winning this time."
Like they have done every single year since 1966. The one victory that English soccer fans still hold onto.
The funny thing is, as soon as England went out of Euro 2004 the newspapers were claiming it was good because Sven Goran Eriksson isn't English and stuff. If they had gone on to win, the English public would be sucking him off to no end. Hypocrites. They were all for it when they were doing relatively well.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Let's place bets on how many newspapers will yet again claim "We have the best chance of winning this time."Like they have done every single year since 1966. The one victory that English soccer fans still hold onto.
The funny thing is, as soon as England went out of Euro 2004 the newspapers were claiming it was good because Sven Goran Eriksson isn't English and stuff. If they had gone on to win, the English public would be sucking him off to no end. Hypocrites. They were all for it when they were doing relatively well.
-AC
true but we could of won it though...we just need to get rid of that big swede head...bad tactics in the euros cost us
"true but we could of won it though...we just need to get rid of that big swede head...bad tactics in the euros cost us"
Relying on two men and having a lame team is what cost THEM. If they were good enough to win, they would have. They didn't.
I don't get WHY people say that. "We didn't win, but we were good enough to." If you were good enough to, you would have.
I also don't like it when people call the English team "We." You are not a member of the team.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
"true but we could of won it though...we just need to get rid of that big swede head...bad tactics in the euros cost us"Relying on two men and having a lame team is what cost THEM. If they were good enough to win, they would have. They didn't.
I don't get WHY people say that. "We didn't win, but we were good enough to." If you were good enough to, you would have.
I also don't like it when people call the English team "We." You are not a member of the team.
-AC
err i seem to remember england scorin a goal against portugal to make it 2-1 but the ref disalowed it and it was a perfect goal...we would of won if the ref didnt disallow...so its not always down to the team to win...other people can have a influence on the game..and the team isnt lame at all...comon son