WELL, I HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE ABOUT 10 TIMES AND I THOUGHT IT WAS AN 8 OUT OF 10. I THINK THAT FREDDY SHOULD HAVE BEEN A LITTLE MORE SCARY THAN HE WAS AND HAVE A FEW MORE KILLS ALSO, HE ONLY KILLLS A FEW POEPLE AND HE WAS NOT SCARY AT ALL, BUT I DID LIKE THE WWF MOVES HE WAS PUTTIN ON JASON AND I THOUGHT THE STORYLINE AND THE SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE PRETTY GOOD
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
i mean this movie was a major oxy moron, you dont see many serious spoofs.
Kelly Rowland's acting, however, was no spoof. This film suffered from some of the absolute worse dialogue ever contrived for a horror movie since "Skinned Alive". Luckily, the majority of it went to the token black chick who can't act.
Originally posted by KRUGER RULES
WELL, I HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE ABOUT 10 TIMES AND I THOUGHT IT WAS AN 8 OUT OF 10. I THINK THAT FREDDY SHOULD HAVE BEEN A LITTLE MORE SCARY THAN HE WAS AND HAVE A FEW MORE KILLS ALSO, HE ONLY KILLLS A FEW POEPLE AND HE WAS NOT SCARY AT ALL, BUT I DID LIKE THE WWF MOVES HE WAS PUTTIN ON JASON AND I THOUGHT THE STORYLINE AND THE SPECIAL EFFECTS WERE PRETTY GOOD
Freddy didnt have any kills
its wwe not wwf, although it should still be wwf, and the wwf moves were dumb
And the story line was crap, for me jason kind of saved the movie
over all I'd give it a 6.5/10 maybe a 7/10
bad acting is a trademark for these kind of movies. There has only been one or two freddy movie where i have witnessed what you might call acceptable acting. Jason movies, well shit i dont even think they do casting calls for those peices of crap. They probably just walk down the street and point at people. Well my point of this is, isnt it about time we learn from what was popular and try and see what lies beyond the dull horizons of cheesy horror.
Please tell me why you would want to see another jason vs freddy movie? One was enough, even though it was nice to see the icons back on the screen, ounce is deffaintly enough. Just as 3 nightmare movies were enough, and 2 13th movies were more than enough