I didn't see the grammy awards so correct me if I'm wrong but 50 cent basicaly did what RATM did back when Limp Bizket beat them at some MTV award. I love RATM and hate 50 cent so it's kinda against my priorities to say what I just said but it's the truth.
So why do 50 cent get put down when they steal the show but RATM are cool when they do the same?
Now don't get me wrong, like I said and I'm saying it again to make sure your clear on this. I absolutely hate 50 cent, there is not a single thing about him that I like. Evanescence on the other hand are not my favorit band but their up there in the top 50 of my list. RATM on the other hand are on my top 20 favorit band list, I love them!
I'm just bringing this up to see opinions...
Originally posted by eggmayo
What happened?
The following month, bassist Commerford was arrested for disorderly conduct at MTV's Video Music Awards following his bizarre disruption of a Limp Bizkit acceptance speech, in which he climbed to the top of a 15-foot set piece and rocked back and forth.
It was quite an event, I definitely agreed that RATM deserved the award ,much more than limp d*ckzit and I was cheering Commerford the whole time but why is it suddenly different when someone we all hate (50 cent) does something similar.