Originally posted by mook
they invaded a country for no reason and without the UN's backing - illegal war.
First off, UN backing means nothing other than 1 thing, that even the most spinless of countries agree to something and that happens HOW often?
😑
You can't say that there was no reason. There was plenty of reason. Just because the findings didn't turn out as planned doesn't mean "they invaded a country for no reason". This is a subject far too lengthy to get into in this forum/venue.
Originally posted by mook
the election was a joke - read 'stupid white men' by micheal moore for all the info on how he stole the election.
Well speaking of jokes, Michael Moore is such an incredible source that it's not even funny. If Rush wrote a book about Clinton, would you bleeding heart libs take it to heart? Hell no. Fact or no fact, you'd blow it off as a righty taking a swipe at a lefty. Same thing goes with Moore writing about Bush.
As far as the election being a joke, take these things into consideration:[list]* The electoral college works. It's worked for years and will continue to work for years. "popular vote" does NOT count for a number of reasons and this is a fact that hasn't bothered the libs until 2000. Hrmm, strange. Sore Losers ya say?
* If Al Gore had won is own fukking state, we wouldn't be having this conversation right now, would we? Gee, when's the last time that a major pres candidate couldn't win his own damn state?
🤨[/list]
Originally posted by mook
yeah russia and france *stayed out* for financial reasons.
however america *went in* for financial reasons, namely;
- huge contracts to american businesses to rebuild iraq
- oil
Um, you need to back up this stupid statement with some facts. Especially where the "oil" comment comes into play. If the US went in for the oil, please explain why gas prices are 50-75 cents more expensive now than they were before we went into Iraq. Bush, personally, must be pumping the oil and storing it all at his ranch, right? "Oil". Phftttt. stupid stupid fukking comment and you libs continue to spew it without backing it at all.
Originally posted by mook
"and whether or not it was about finishing what 'daddy started' it yet to be determined" - so you cant deny what i said.
Forever will some of us ponder the inabilities of Clinton to do much of anything other than chase skirt, rather than attend to matters at hand (no pun intended) with Al Queda being one and Iraq being the other. Instead he simply ignored all attacks on US soil (93' WTC) and all foreign US attacks. A dick in hand is worth 100k terrorists in the brush, right?