no, its like saying no murdering in a suicide joint....1's worse than the other because it involves a person who doesnt want to be killled
he wants to do it himself!
(part joke in this post, but the idea comes across)
i really dont get why u dont understand the difference between smoking and drinking. lol, imo its pretty plain to see how smoking is worse
The fact is there are too many liberal sons of a bitches already just looking for something to complain about. Getting rid of 'under god' from the pledge yet they won't discuss the 'in god we trust' on currency. People bitching about gay marriages, but not considering if gay divorce should be allowed (lol) and now people who get shit faced in a bar don't want to have smoke around them. You don't like it, leave, its that simple stop bitchin and leave, it ain't that hard.
Originally posted by Df02
no, its like saying no murdering in a suicide joint....1's worse than the other because it involves a person who doesnt want to be killledhe wants to do it himself!
(part joke in this post, but the idea comes across)i really dont get why u dont understand the difference between smoking and drinking. lol, imo its pretty plain to see how smoking is worse
maybe it is...but a person can smoke a carton and not kill someone directly as opposed to someone who drinks to the point of bein'g sh!t faced and drivin' off into the sunset...
drinking sensebly okay...but most people who go to bars don't usually do that...if you ban one thing you must ban all the others that are bad for us...but then, banning anything is bad...look what it did for prohibition...the blackmarket is gonna have a field day if it continues to the point where ciggies are illegal
theres a difference between drinking and drink-driving.... ie one of them is illegal lol.
not every1 who drinks gets shit-faced, but every1 who smokes in public affects people around them's health.
and as for the "if u dont like it, leave" thing - well, no ty....they're hopefully banning it, so u leave lol
Originally posted by Linkalicious
but they aren't banning smoking...they are banning it inside. It's not like bars don't have alternative places to smoke...
yeah...but that's the first step into one day outright banning all together...maybe not today...but sometime in the years to come...
you can't just ban it inside...there are some places where you can't even smoke outside...or at least 20 ft from the intrance...
it should've never even been banned...non-smokers always have the choice to not go to those places where smoking is allowed...
after all...smokers are still a minority in this country
no im not complaining for the sake of complaining lol....
excessive drinking can cause liver failure.....great, good news for all the social drinkers out there, because they will face absolutely no side affects thruout there lives.......
Smoking however is alot more dangerous, because just casual smoking gives bad side effects.
u admitted earlier that u understand y smoking is worse than drinking, yet u still argue against smoking being banned by comparing it to drinking.....¬¬
i know for a fact that both are bad whether directly or indirectly...
the part imo that i have a problem and i can't speak for the others is banning anything at all...good or bad, to ban something that is legal is in some ways an infringement on an individuals right to decide for themselves how they should live whether or not we agree with it...
I myself do not smoke nor drink, but I would not want to tell someone how they should live their lives or what they can or cannot do for it too would infringe on their right to live their lives....
I just choose not to be around where there are smokers...and that I can live with...
there are no varying degrees of which is worse because both are bad for the body, but drinking has a quicker affect on one's perception than smoking a pack...