Neil-- no longer crippled, has soccer skills, can change women's clothing with his mind.
Will-- Dungeonmaster, can manipulate objects out of thin air.
Kristen-- nimble, gymnastic skills.
Kincaid-- super strength.
Taryn-- superhuman knife-weilding.
Here is a link to the screenplay.
Regardless of what the scene with Lori and Will at the end meant, it was
a horrible cheesy scene, and I thank god that it was taken out; bad acting. A scene that I think all of us would agree on being put into the film(the opening "Jason's dormant dream" sequence) would have to be the remake of the scene at the end of Jason goes to Hell where Freddy's glove comes out of the ground to pull Jason's mask down. Yes that scene was remade, it can be scene in the Freddy Vs Jason DVD menu when your transferring to a different selection theres a quick shot of it. I don't remember at the moment what menu option you go through to see it? I'm sure someone will read this and be able to answer that question...
Heres a slip up for you; if you watch the Freddy Vs Jason DVD in full frame you can see distortion at the bottom during the CGI "Got YOUR Nooose!" scene from poor editing....Also, what Samhain was referring to is that the mattress during the scene can be seen; of course the stuntmen use safety precautions during those scenes, the point is your not suppose to see the mattress from your magic film viewing window...Dipshit..sorry, I couldn't help myself.
You can find the scene on one of the TV spots, I think its the "dare" one. But I loved the orginal ending, the acting was great and I don't know why your all saying "oh this movie or that movie sucked because the acting was bad!" when I doubt any of you could act any better. And obviously they are all good actors otherwise they wouldn't have been hired!
Settle down man, OK, there were some alright acting; Robert Englund, of course being very well educated and an excellent actor in my opinion. But honestly now, you can't admit that there was a good share of bad acting in Freddy Vs Jason. For a good example; the "weak Freddy shadow" scene when his shadow approaches the guy in the street, but isn't strong enough to do any harm and the actor looks down at his chest and says "Oh few, I'm OK" and then runs off, come on! And of course the as*hole boyfriend who's crushed in the bed, also the main Character Lori, horribly unrealistic, not natural or down to earth. And you definitely have one huge misconception. This film had approximately $35 million to it's name, in today's industry that's not exactly grounds for being picky. Definite proof of everything I just said is that the girl from destinies child was in the film; which is almost equivalent to product placement. What do you not understand, when all the suits(The one who actually control the show) are sitting around, their talking about marketing, how well the audience will accept the film in question, etc. Ideas like if you get this person or that person to be in this film will support a larger budget because they think the "consumer" thats right you and me; if we see a famous popular face tickets might sell better, I loved Freddy Vs Jason, especially when Freddy goes into the soul, sub-conscious, mind whatever you want to call it of Jason and Jason is dragging the body to his home and when enters opens the closet, brilliant scene, but don't be a b*tch, sorry got out of control...
Also if you watch Freddy vs Jason when they show ebn in the hospital at says Kruger 6 on the tv but also all funny shit in the movie the one thing that bugs me the most is when jason gets his eyes turn out he gots it back BUT when he walks out of the water his fingers are still gone how the hell can jason hold freddys ****ing head? Explain that to me plz. 😮💨
That's right psychopathfreak; it was left very open ended, but regardless of whether your a Freddy fan or Jason fan, Jason definitely dominated the film, more kills, but as far as the Fight between the two, they balanced that out very well, some people might say that Jason was the clear victor because Freddy was decapitated, but that's tricky because Jason didn't actually decapitate him, and the part at the very end when Freddy winks can't really be used as a defense because it's not really apart of the film, it's just a self aware nodd/joke to the fans...
I think it should forget about the seventh movie and go back to the personality of freddy through the first movie. A silent maniac killer that dosent make jokes about his victims.
It should be about someone that moves into the house nancy lived in and freddy comes back for a whole new massacer. He should start killing people, and the kid living in nancys house gets a dream about everything that happened in the first six films, and he also becomes aware of how to stop him for good...get him in the real world but dont kill him. Put him in a place where he wont die and get back to the dream world. Of course friends that are thinking that this is all a coincidence starts dreaming and never wake up if you know what I mean.
This is about the old freddy that killed you in your dreams the normal way (that sounds funny). example: if he stabbed your chest in the dream world it should be like the first movie when tina dies and not like the fourth movie when kincade and joey(i think) and that other guy, they get stabbed but they get no wounds. But if you wake up when he is doing something he stoppes, nothing like what happened to rod in the first movie where even thoough he was awake freddy still killed him.
I think it should forget about the seventh movie and go back to the personality of freddy through the first movie. A silent maniac killer that dosent make jokes about his victims.
It should be about someone that moves into the house nancy lived in and freddy comes back for a whole new massacer. He should start killing people, and the kid living in nancys house gets a dream about everything that happened in the first six films, and he also becomes aware of how to stop him for good...get him in the real world but dont kill him. Put him in a place where he wont die and get back to the dream world. Of course friends that are thinking that this is all a coincidence starts dreaming and never wake up if you know what I mean.
This is about the old freddy that killed you in your dreams the normal way (that sounds funny). example: if he stabbed your chest in the dream world it should be like the first movie when tina dies and not like the fourth movie when kincade and joey(i think) and that other guy, they get stabbed but they get no wounds. But if you wake up when he is doing something he stoppes, nothing like what happened to rod in the first movie where even thoough he was awake freddy still killed him.
what do you think