do u smoke

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Smoking is shit, and unlike weed, it's actually pointless. The act of smoking is pretty pointless.

Yeah man, Jimi Hendrix. What a drop-out, down and out loser, never found anything to do, never had a purpose in life.

That'll be the drugs. Then there's The Beatles, drugs ruined them, amounted to nothing.

Then there's all those other great musicians who do drugs, contribute amazingly to art under the influence of drugs, and change musical culture as we know it, doing a lot more for the world than most sober people.

Total, utter, losers.

-AC

I know some people weed seems to actually do them some good. Like people with ADHD or just bad concentration it seems to help them concentrate. And if it helps then why not.

Cigarettes sucks.

Go for marijuana. 🥷

Originally posted by |(ongu
Cigarettes sucks.

Go for marijuana. 🥷

this deserves a quote...

Originally posted by Mairuzu
this deserves a quote...

You just quoted it. ermmsmart

Originally posted by |(ongu
You just quoted it. ermmsmart

I noticed 😆

thats why i did it 😛

I quit smoking about a year ago. I can't believe I smoked for so long.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
I noticed 😆

thats why i did it 😛

Wow, that`s sm-sma-s-sm.. intelligent. 😖mart:

Originally posted by |(ongu
Cigarettes sucks.

Go for marijuana. 🥷

Originally posted by lord xyz
I agree. Really, I do.

But Cannabis cigarettes are better than marijuana.

It works, believe me. 313

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah man, Jimi Hendrix. What a drop-out, down and out loser, never found anything to do, never had a purpose in life.

That'll be the drugs. Then there's The Beatles, drugs ruined them, amounted to nothing.

Then there's all those other great musicians who do drugs, contribute amazingly to art under the influence of drugs, and change musical culture as we know it, doing a lot more for the world than most sober people.

Total, utter, losers.

-AC

You're saying drugs made them famous? that without the inclusion of drugs they would've never achieved what they did?

Originally posted by Scythe
You're saying drugs made them famous? that without the inclusion of drugs they would've never achieved what they did?

I'm saying drugs have played a huge part in a lot of the greatest art that has given meaning, enjoyment and fulfillment to our lives, and can provide ways and means to other perspectives not reachable without them. To say they are entirely negative and anyone who uses them is a loser is infinitely more idiotic than taking any drug.

I'm not promoting drugs, I'm just not denying what they've done.

There's good and bad.

-AC

Originally posted by |(ongu
Cigarettes sucks.

Go for marijuana. 🥷

Bleck, weed tastes so gross, I have no idea how you put up with it.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm saying drugs have played a huge part in a lot of the greatest art that has given meaning, enjoyment and fulfillment to our lives, and can provide ways and means to other perspectives not reachable without them. To say they are entirely negative and anyone who uses them is a loser is infinitely more idiotic than taking any drug.

I'm not promoting drugs, I'm just not denying what they've done.

There's good and bad.

-AC

That's assuming Hendrix (or other) wouldn't of have been just as great without the drugs though... granted, he (his music) would have been a different; who's to say it would have been worse, as fact?

Originally posted by Robtard
That's assuming Hendrix wouldn't of have been just as great without the drugs though... granted, he (his music) would have been a different; who's to say it would have been worse (or better for that matter)?

Who's saying that? Take Hendrix entirely out of the equation if you want.

It doesn't alter the factual truth of what I'm saying. Drugs have done, or played a part in creating, positive things. I'm not saying he'd have been worse, better or the same, I'm saying many people attribute their best work to being high, it's been the probably cause of some amazing music.

If Layne Staley never found heroin, we likely would never have had Dirt by Alice in Chains, that's a fact.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Who's saying that? Take Hendrix entirely out of the equation if you want.

It doesn't alter the factual truth of what I'm saying. Drugs have done, or played a part in creating, positive things. I'm not saying he'd have been worse, better or the same, I'm saying many people attribute their best work to being high, it's been the probably cause of some amazing music.

If Layne Staley never found heroin, we likely would never have had Dirt by Alice in Chains, that's a fact.

-AC

I edited "or other" as you were posting. I was using Jimi as an example.

It seemed like you were saying, "they (their work) wouldn't be great without drug use", as an absolute, wasn't the case though.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm saying drugs have played a huge part in a lot of the greatest art that has given meaning, enjoyment and fulfillment to our lives, and can provide ways and means to other perspectives not reachable without them. To say they are entirely negative and anyone who uses them is a loser is infinitely more idiotic than taking any drug.

I'm not promoting drugs, I'm just not denying what they've done.

There's good and bad.

-AC

Yes, and I understand that, but I am reffering to the 'little' people. Local drug nuts who's lives could've actually been something but were destroyed because an addiction blindsided them. I completely agree with you on drugs changing music forever, but just like you stated, the bad. The bad side that affects the common ground. These people's lives will never be better off if they take up drugs, they're missed by family and never seen by friends ever again because a of their life choices. Most pre-teens who use drugs are most likely those that are confused, not sure what to do or where to go. If they had alittle more direction, I doubt they would resort to drugs.

Originally posted by Scythe
Yes, and I understand that, but I am reffering to the 'little' people. Local drug nuts who's lives could've actually been something but were destroyed because an addiction blindsided them. I completely agree with you on drugs changing music forever, but just like you stated, the bad. The bad side that affects the common ground. These people's lives will never be better off if they take up drugs, they're missed by family and never seen by friends ever again because a of their life choices. Most pre-teens who use drugs are most likely those that are confused, not sure what to do or where to go. If they had alittle more direction, I doubt they would resort to drugs.

In all fairness, that's just personal experience, but ultimately baseless nonsense.

You clearly subscribe to the idea that drugs destroy people, that doesn't actually have to be the case, and isn't for many people.

You cannot say people will not be better off if they take drugs. Many regular people attribute drug experiences to their acquiring of wonderous new perspectives.

What do you think of drinking alcohol?

-AC

Originally posted by C. C. Cowgirl
[b]Smoking is for losers 😄

And as Alpha Centauri said, it is pointless 😛 [/B]

No i don't like suck habit although all of us know how wide spread this habit is all around the world.
I can't stand the disgusting taste and smell of this shit.
I think it's a bad habit and i recommend all who think that it's something good to avoid going with such killing habit and all of us know how many cancer victims this cigarette kills every year.

Anyone seen "Thank you for smoking/"Now that is a good movie1jm