Originally posted by wuTa
if he kept his word than he we would have a better economy...whatever happen to that trickle down effect..that didnt do sh#t..i'm not saying kerry is any better but i dont trust or like either of them but bush just lies to a whole nation....he went to war over weapons of mass destruction that never existed....are freedom of speech is gettin more and more limited and this is all happening while bush is in office, are you saying this a a quiocidence
The trickle down effect didn't work but he didn't lie about what he was trying to do.
He went to war for 2 reasons, remove Sadam and find weapons of mass destruction. He didn't find any but that doesn't mean he lied.
Freedom of speech, whether you think he is taking it away or not, doesn't mean he is lying either. We are talking about honesty here. Whether or not you think he was a good president, he has been pretty damn honest.
Originally posted by Gravity Kills
Bush...He said we went to war for WMD, we found none.Iraq was said to be a big oil supplier...No it is less then 5% of what we have
The only Country I see anything wrong with is Korea. We know they have nukes but we do nothing.
ummm do you remember in the beinning of the war when the scuds were launched at Isreal and at our forces moving into Iraq?.... Not to be arqumental but those right there were WMDs... and where did those launchers go?.... they are probably moved into nearby countries just to make the US and the world bad... is that not the perfect rouse... ?
Originally posted by Myth
The trickle down effect didn't work but he didn't lie about what he was trying to do.
He went to war for 2 reasons, remove Sadam and find weapons of mass destruction. He didn't find any but that doesn't mean he lied.
Freedom of speech, whether you think he is taking it away or not, doesn't mean he is lying either. We are talking about honesty here. Whether or not you think he was a good president, he has been pretty damn honest.
he said the trickle down effect would work...it didnt...isnt that a lie?....he said that there were WMD so goint to war is justified...we didnt find any....isnt that a lie?...he has been anything but honest..the only thing that i know for sure about him is that he's against gay marraige...thats the only thing he's been honest about
Actually we don't know if the trickle down works yet... it seems to have in the past because thats what Reagen used to get us outa the hole.
Saddam did have WMDs because he used them as soon as we crossed into his border... remember the scuds launched at isreal and our forces in the beginning parts of this war. He wasn't supposed to have those yet he did....
Scuds are, they invoke only terror... they are the most inaccurate weapon on earth compared to todays arsenal, ever heard of the V2 or V1 thats what the scud is. they can be retrofited in five minutes with chemical or nuclear payloads.
Any arguement against that is like saying an ICBM with conventional payload being launched and used as a feild weapon... you launch one of those with nuke or not and you just started WW3
If they had the guts to use them when we got into bagdad they would have used them on us in the first war. They didn't use, or rather withdrew them into other countries, to create political intrgue... making us look bad... how could everyone in the world undeniably know that Iraq has WMDs yet not find them... the CIA MI6 and MOSSAD do not make mistakes like that. Saddam by the way, if you remember, threatened to use them on us when we entered iraq in this war.
Why did he refuse inspectors then all those years if he didn't have them?
Did anyone protest when Clinton launched airstrikes and Tommawks into iraq when Saddam refused inspectors?