28 days later could have been better

Started by Mordecai2 pages
Originally posted by Lord Soth
Of course it could have been better, there's no such things as the perfect movie, no matter what ppl think

That is true, ALL movies could use improvement and none are perfect, but some people think some movies are fine the way they are.

I don't think 28 Days Later is perfect, but i think its just fine and dandy how it is.

I can't think of anything specific that needed improvement with 28 Days Later.

Originally posted by samhain
The scene was there to add suspense (and how!) if it were a realistic film he would never have gotten out of the hospital to begin with, the cab driver and his daughter couldn't have possibly have set up such a stronghold in the tower block and when the bloke tells the story of how his family went to the airport there is no concievable way he could have gotten down from that kiosk to escape the airport safely.

all of this i fully understand. its just that i hate scenes that arent really necessary except to get you off your seat. for example when they were in the tunnel they were creeped out ot start bout going into it so they decide to and then they do the whole cat thing and then get a flat. so they are all creeped out by being in this tunnel but still they decide that they must fix the flat in side of it, when in fact they could just drive like 20 yards to the exit of the tunnel so that they could A. have sunlight and B. not being so worried. then i could see them changing the tire! i reason very i find it so horrible is that it is obvious that they wrote nad that scene in the movie because the characters were stuck in a creepy place and that having the infected spotting them in mid-tire change was a great idea to add suspence. where they could have had them do (what in my mind) the logical thing and go out of the tunnel first and then be caught and what not. but then again thisis what i look for.