Blade vs Duncan MacLeod

Started by norrin radd4 pages
Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Connor LET Duncan kill him, so Duncan can gain his SUPERIOR power/experience, so that Duncan could beat the villain guy(cant remember his name)

i know that, thats why i´ve said you can´t say duncan is stronger, but you can´t say duncan is weaker to, he didn´t wanted to fight against connor.
but really you are saying you like the filmes better then the series? how can that be?

Ok, I agree that Duncan is better then Connor cuz Lambert lost his charm at the hospital where he was born, but still that don't mean he can beat Blade.
I'm sorry but highlanders r outdated and no match for Blade. I haven't seen Duncan throw someone through a pillar of cement. I haven't seen any acrobatic moves that can do him justice and make me feel like he would win against Blade. I like the HIghlander charm, but it's gone now, Blade is here and his time is NOW.

I don't think they will come up with anything cooler then Blade for the next 10 years. Don't take my word for it, but I think so.

Blade will probably win. I guess Duncan has more experience, but we're talking about Blade !! He's definitely the better fighter.

Originally posted by norrin radd
I didn´t said that, i said connor sucks, not duncan.
i don´t want to offend your fammily, but don´t you think your take this to serious connor and duncan are not reeeaaaaaalllllllllllll

it was mainly was just a joke even though my last name does translate as "highlander"

Originally posted by Daywalker
1) Blade is Better

2) Sounds like you're forced to choose the Highlander due to family commitment

3) Blade is much better 😎

listin just because my last name is Highlander dosent mean that thats why I say that the thing is thats why I think connor micleod is so cool. My name dosent even say "highlander" it is the celtic word for it.

and second blade could possible die conner can not die

Originally posted by Spawnie
Ok, I agree that Duncan is better then Connor cuz Lambert lost his charm at the hospital where he was born, but still that don't mean he can beat Blade.
I'm sorry but highlanders r outdated and no match for Blade. I haven't seen Duncan throw someone through a pillar of cement. I haven't seen any acrobatic moves that can do him justice and make me feel like he would win against Blade. I like the HIghlander charm, but it's gone now, Blade is here and his time is NOW.

I don't think they will come up with anything cooler then Blade for the next 10 years. Don't take my word for it, but I think so.

even though duncan hasent throwth people into cement but he killed 152 imortals and survived being impaled on a piece of three foot long metal and hes thought in every major war in history

P.S. duncan and conner do have power they heal much faster than normal people and they can sense other inmortals and ducan does know martial arts

yes, but blade has enhanced speed, and strenght, and connor can died if blade cuts is head.

I don't care in how many wars he has faught or how many wives he had so far, I'm saying he can't beat Blade. Duncan might have slayed many immortals but he never had something like Blade against him. He is way too fast for Duncan among other things. We have seen Blade behead guys that didn't even know what was coming. I'm not saying that Duncan wouldn't put up a fight, but in the end Blade would just come on top.

well duncan would have a "quickining" witch is a lot like blades rage form he has powerful as blade during a "quickining"

ok, for those of you who don't know highlanders(the immortals) well, or just blade fanatics, heres a few points to consider:

1.) Duncan's martial arts dwarfs blade's martial arts. he's had centuries of training for crying out loud. Blade ain't nowhere near duncan's hand 2 hand combat skills. it just seems like blade is the better fighter coz he had better effects in his movie. same is true for the swordsmanship.

2.) When highlander's decapitate another immortal, their opponents skills transfer to them. so that means duncan has his centuries of training, plus the centuries of training all his other killed opponents had.

3.) altho the strength of their fallen victim doesn't directly add to theirs, highlanders do get stronger everytime they kill one of their kind. so they're a lot stronger than mortal men. in the highlander 2 the movie, connor just rips off a metal railing from its cemented foundation... and he was in a severely weakened state when he did this...

Connor isn't the one,if you saw endgame duncan was much stronger. But Connor was sort of a mentor for Duncan. Everbody knows..there can only be "one"....to end the suffering,the pain they had. Especially Connor,everyone he loved died. As for Duncan,his skills are phenomenal...he even locked himself in a monk's temple to train to face the "devil" (highlander tv show). So the main question is: Blade or Duncan? Blade doesn't stand a chance against a 600 year old warrior.

No, if you saw Endgame, Conner gave himself up to Duncan, so that Duncan would be superior. Conner had nothing left(as in family and all that), so he gave his superior power to Duncan. He was tired of loosing the people he loved. Remember, the longer a Highlander has been around, the stronger he is, and Conner was around way before Duncan. Besides, there is another who is more powerful than both of them. The Highlander that was around for over 1000 years, what's his name? I know it started with an "M"

Well,it's a fact that Connor and Duncan fought eachother...and DUNCAN WON!!! He's the better one...(in endgame)

That's what im saying, in Endgame, Connor lost on purpose.

I don't mean that....before....in history,when they have a duel...Duncan wins...remember?

the guy older then Duncon and Conner is Mythos he is thousands of years older the any other liveing highlander

THAT'S IT! Mythos! thanks.

Originally posted by FrothByte
ok, for those of you who don't know highlanders(the immortals) well, or just blade fanatics, heres a few points to consider:

1.) Duncan's martial arts dwarfs blade's martial arts. he's had centuries of training for crying out loud. Blade ain't nowhere near duncan's hand 2 hand combat skills. it just seems like blade is the better fighter coz he had better effects in his movie. same is true for the swordsmanship.

2.) When highlander's decapitate another immortal, their opponents skills transfer to them. so that means duncan has his centuries of training, plus the centuries of training all his other killed opponents had.

3.) altho the strength of their fallen victim doesn't directly add to theirs, highlanders do get stronger everytime they kill one of their kind. so they're a lot stronger than mortal men. in the highlander 2 the movie, connor just rips off a metal railing from its cemented foundation... and he was in a severely weakened state when he did this...

see someone understand the facts

Ok, with all these facts that u have imprinted in your head, tell me why didn't Duncan do half of it? Screw the effects, the fight scenes were poorly done, and the sword fights sucked. The guy playing Duncan was ok, but alltogether cheesy. They did a series, they had a chance to make highlander better, and yes they made the story a bit better, but that is all. Knowing all these facts and watching the series is a sin. Cuz none of this 600 year old experience comes to life for real.
I can never see Duncan do what Blade can do, plain and simple. Duncan is bigger in stature, so all those fancy blade moves don't fit him, cuz he can't perform them! U can fantasize as much as u like about Duncans abilities, cuz I don't have to say the same about Blade.

Duncan is no more agile then a great Samurai.