Help me understand something about this trilogy!!!!
in part 1, everything went as smooth as whipped cream. i understood it without a problem. 2 it was kinda the same way. but what i want to start with the neo/smith fight in part 2 in the middle of the....... whatever they were standing in. when the smiths *multiple* started to surround neo. i knew a major fight was about to happen, so i got the usual excited-ness about me and was wanting to see what happened. the fight breaks out and neo starts pounding on the smiths. then smith wants "more". so more rush in to fight neo. he isn't doing to badly, but he is being over run. but the point remains that he is still defeating a large number of smiths. so finally he is trying to move about but everywhere he goes there are smiths plowing into him, but he still has the upperhand. at the end of the fight he decides to bail out. (this has some significance later)
so we move on to part 3. i didn't get to watch the movie in theatres so i had to wait till it came out on dvd to watch it. boy was i dissappointed. i saw the previous on t.v. i saw neo walking down the street with smiths lined up and down the street and along the buildings with a single "agent" in the road awaiting neo. i thought to myself "oh man, how could he defeat so many". i couldn't wait to see him put an ass whoopin on all those smiths. so i finally bought the dvd and i had built up so much anticipation in this fight. the movies is almost over and it finally happens. neo only fights 1 smith???? WHAT THE FU*K happened???? why in part 2 was neo able to defeat so many of them and in part 3, he couldn't even beat 1? what made smith grow in so much power that he began to dwarf neo "the one" anderson in power??? i just don't understand what it was that made the gap that big......... also, after neo let smith copy him, how did that destroy him??? and why did everybody return to thier original self except neo??? wy is it that he is the only one not seen again??? needless to say i might never watch the movie again.