I agree, but the 2003 Peter Pan was made by Universal, not Disney, and while it literally bombed in the United States, I think it's sorely underrated.
For the sake of the vague topic title 😛 , there's a Peter Pan thread in progress here: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7106&highlight=peter+pan
What do you mean "updated" it was never a live action movie to begin with? I don't even count the miserable 1991 "Hook" movie.
I thought it was spectacular. Masterful special effects courtesy of ILM, spectacular casting in Jason Isaacs as Hook/Mr. Darling, and the costuming was top notch.
I respect your opnion, but you may be in the minority here. 😛
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
What do you mean "updated" it was never a live action movie to begin with? I don't even count the miserable 1991 "Hook" movie.I thought it was spectacular. Masterful special effects courtesy of ILM, spectacular casting in Jason Isaacs as Hook/Mr. Darling, and the costuming was top notch.
I respect your opnion, but you may be in the minority here. 😛
It just got boring though the special effects where dazziling and filled with wonder they threw to many at me that I got annoyed
Backfire,the boy was indeed annoying 🙁
I count HOOK as a Peter Pan movie I would definetly rather sit that movie than this one.
🙁The man who played the captain was good he was exactly what hook should look like 🙂
I was expecting alot of action from the previews and everything but when it came down to it its was nothing like I had expected and I felt like I wasted my money 🙁