Hey most of society enjoys crap.there are many bad movies that have been made that were crap and were box office hits and many movies that were very well made and underated that were box office flops,there was never any doubt in my mind it would be a smash hit at the box office because spiderman is such a popular character,with all that clever advertising and promotions they made both times,there was no way these movies were not going to be smash hits at the box office, so please don t give that old lame argument that has been given so many times in the past that it was a good movie because it made so much money at the box office nonsense I hear all the time from the manspider fans.
Yeah, mr Parker. Those man spider fans are so ridiculous as always. Their logic is the ilogic. So, by their ridiculous theories, the phantom menace is better than casablanca, scooby doo is better than citizen kane and the american pie movies are better than the godfather because they have made more money in the box office. So logical and coherant. 🙄
I think Mr Parker is just trolling for flames.
What it boils down to is this:
Mr Parker is an intolerant bastard who seems to flip out at the slightest change. Thus, he must blaspheme the name of Spider-Man in order to satiate his uncontrollable and rather confusing lust for some form of petty revenge against Sam Raimi. This leads him to call Spider-Man "Man-Spider" because Spider-Man now has organic webshooters, which, for some unknown reason, have transformed him into a monstrous spider that has some semblance of a human. It also represents all the ills and wrongdoings of society today.
Mr Parker and bakerboy, if you're going to have signatures that make you suck as people, at least make them grammatically correct.
Originally posted by FeceMan
I think Mr Parker is just trolling for flames.What it boils down to is this:
Mr Parker is an intolerant who seems to flip out at the slightest change. Thus, he must blaspheme the name of Spider-Man in order to satiate his uncontrollable and rather confusing lust for some form of petty revenge against Sam Raimi. This leads him to call Spider-Man "Man-Spider" because Spider-Man now has organic webshooters, which, for some unknown reason, have transformed him into a monstrous spider that has some semblance of a human. It also represents all the ills and wrongdoings of society today.
Mr Parker and bakerboy, if you're going to have signatures that make you suck as people, at least make them grammatically correct.
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii disagree
Originally posted by FeceMan
I think Mr Parker is just trolling for flames.What it boils down to is this:
Mr Parker is an intolerant bastard who seems to flip out at the slightest change. Thus, he must blaspheme the name of Spider-Man in order to satiate his uncontrollable and rather confusing lust for some form of petty revenge against Sam Raimi. This leads him to call Spider-Man "Man-Spider" because Spider-Man now has organic webshooters, which, for some unknown reason, have transformed him into a monstrous spider that has some semblance of a human. It also represents all the ills and wrongdoings of society today.
Mr Parker and bakerboy, if you're going to have signatures that make you suck as people, at least make them grammatically correct.
An intolerant bastard? you need to look in the mirror when calling someone a troll.Engaging in name calling which is what you are doing now is whats trolling.
don't worry guys, spiderman is an awesome superhero and they turned it into an excellent movie. I personally think that it is better that they added the organic webshooters. It makes him more of a mutant, which adds more drama to his life. I like this because i'm sick of superhero movies where they only make the hero half mutant. In the worst case senario, we have batman. I mean, he is cool and all, but he's not a superhero, he's just a vigilante, and if spiderman simply has cartridges to shoot out webs, that somewhat makes him a vigilante too, so its' better to have the organic ones. Oh, and mr parker, if you continue insisting that we call him manspider, then maybe we should call you parker mr.. see how you like it when people f*ck up your name
You can gaurentee that there would not be more than four spiderman movies. Betting on four is an unlikely bet. Raimi said that the spiderman movies are very draining for him, and that parkers character isnt as interesting to him anymore. Dunst will leave after three. If Raimi leaves, maguire will leave the franchise, he has alreday made that clear. Besides, maguire is an actor with acting ability, he doesnt have to rely on a single character to get work as an actor. I dont see him staying on the spidey franchise much longer regaurdless of raimi's participation. Raimi will leave after three, and so will maguire. Now this doesnt mean they wont push on for another installment, but it owuld be a horrible failure without what makes the movies so popular. However, maguire did sign a contract for six spiderman movies, but this doesnt mean they will get made.