Originally posted by Vengeance
gotta love the way my and CD always fight lol. well it gives me somthing to do.
Fight? I debate. You're just a sloppy antagonist, with invalid points that you try to pass off as opinion, honestly.
Originally posted by Vengeance
well then you were "ultimately wrong" also. becuase you said there were three. so i'll take that.
Wrong again.
In "Blade 2", he showed he was capable of allegiance and emotion, actually. Two MAJOR developments in his character.
Two, not three. I was right, as I was saying.
BTW, the name of the Van Wilder actor is Ryan Reynolds.
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Fight? I debate. You're just a sloppy antagonist, with invalid points that you try to pass off as opinion, honestly.Wrong again.
Two, not three. I was right, as I was saying.
BTW, the name of the Van Wilder actor is Ryan Reynolds.
Originally posted by Vengeance
this is funny before you say i have no points yet but just there you said i make invailid points ,so i still make points wow. plus being able to make an allegience is a big f'ing char development. he made on with the old guy in the first one.
..and I quote..
Fight? I debate. You're just a sloppy antagonist, with invalid points that you try to pass off as opinion, honestly.
Invalid points, meaning things you believe to be some sort of "point" to what your saying, when in fact are nothing more than opinions.
Mr. Vengeance, keep in mind, I am the one who mentioned that he made an alliance in "Blade 2". One of the 2 major character developments in the movie. Developments are things that are established AFTER the fact.
If you were a real Blade fan, you would have known that Whistler met him on the streets of Detroit in 82. When Blade was 18 YEARS OLD and LONG before he became a vampire hunter. He was taken in by Whistler, pretty much against his will.
Whistler was his mentor, his father figure, his foster father in a sense.
Therefore, his alliance with Whistler wasn't an alliance at all.
Any other "points" you'd like to make?
Originally posted by Drifter101
yea hopefully jessical beil doesnt ruin the whole action kick ass vibe we're suppost to get from the flick.
Cheers to that. Jessica Biel isn't a fantastic actress, just because no matter what character shes playing, all you see is Jessica Biel. So I expect to be thinking "WTF is the 7th Heaven chick doing next to Blade?" while watching it. I really feel that this will hurt the franchise.
If they're going to bring back Whistlers daughter, they should have at least used some (relatively) unknown actress.
But I know Mr. Cinemaddiction won't mind, since he's a Biel fan. 🙄
Originally posted by All_For_Orlando
I was gonna say, i didnt see her in summer catch. Go me! 😛
Will this be the last blade?
Originally posted by Vengeance
so really i dont think it that major. and even if you fight this to the death i still just dont think that the over all look on being able to form a team isn't a major char development.
Going from being someone who was independent, and trusted no one, to teaming up with the very beings he hunted down is a major, major character development, and what made Blade 2 so special. His evolution.
Blade joining the blood pack to defeat Damaskinos and the reapers was done to showcase ANOTHER development in his character, being leadership, when he had to head up the Bloodpack. So, while he may have never had a choice, being used to working in the shadows and alone, to come forward and lead a group to victory (for the most part) takes the place of the lesser alliance development that I guess is forced afterall.
So, I'll agree with you on being forced to join, if you can agree that he went from lone ranger to mob boss.