Who decides who's punk and who's not? Good question, who decides what's rock, and what's hip hop, and what's pop, who decides what genre any band is? It's just like anything, you look at the characteristics of the band's music, and if they don't meet the same characteristics punk needs to have, they're not punk. Is it that hard?
Go listen to some Sex Pistols and THEN tell me blink are punk. (I don't like the Sex Pistols btw 😛)
i know it is about genre but some people say band a is punk then another group says they are not. they is no other genre that bands are argued over like this. it is all opinion. i have listened to the sex pistols and they are great. just because they are better does not mean that blink is not punk. or that they are.
Originally posted by bardock
i know it is about genre but some people say band a is punk then another group says they are not. they is no other genre that bands are argued over like this. it is all opinion. i have listened to the sex pistols and they are great. just because they are better does not mean that blink is not punk. or that they are.
No, I still stand by my original statement... blink aren't punk. True punk is underground music, which just means they don't play it on the radio or MTV, and they rely entirely on word-of-mouth to gain support from their fans. True punk is also anti-establishment, which blink sure as hell are not. Now, there's nothing wrong with not being punk, because tbh I don't like old punk a whole lot. But blink are as far from it as you can get without being flat out pop.