Perfection

Started by eleveninches9 pages

the idiot was destined to be an idiot. Therefore, he has achieved his role in the universe perfectly and has perfectly fulfilled his destiny of being an idiot.

I don't believe in destiny.

well, being an idiot was (is) the purpose of an idiot, and it is a task that he/she fulfills perfectly

the genius bores the idiot.
how come your able to bore people then

As I said, the genius bores all idiots.

yeah and again how come you are able to bore someone then

I think the reason is obvious.

only obvious to you

Exactly, I see things that idiots doesn't - to the idiot, very little things are obvious.

You see things that idiots don't. Like your genius intellect.

To tell you the truth, I don't see that either and I'm no idiot.

No offence meant, but everytime I dip into the Philosophy forum you are just here claiming to be some brain power Pete when you're not actually saying things.

An idiot over complicates, a genius can simplify and retain meaning.

-AC

Exactly, I see things that idiots doesn't - to the idiot, very little things are obvious
the only thing that is obvious here is that you aint no genious.

Exactly.

Looking through his posts, he makes grammar mistakes nobody should be making, which do not appear to be typos, they're strategically placed.

Nobody on KMC has ever leaned so heavily on a thesaurus I believe.

-AC

Topc guys, don't let some bullshit ramblings destroy a thread.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You see things that idiots don't. Like your genius intellect.

To tell you the truth, I don't see that either and I'm no idiot.

No offence meant, but everytime I dip into the Philosophy forum you are just here claiming to be some brain power Pete when you're not actually saying things.

An idiot over complicates, a genius can simplify and retain meaning.

-AC

I don't actually say things? I wrote a big deal of philosophical ideas in this forum, you on the other hand have nothing to show - you only criticise me as you have nothing original to say. Anyway, I got a lot of compliments in this forum from other members about my philosophy, also in other forums - peterKSL is one of them - one of the few here who can talk philosophy.

We can achieve the things we want to perfection. All we lack is the light to show the way.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Exactly.

Looking through his posts, he makes grammar mistakes nobody should be making, which do not appear to be typos, they're strategically placed.

Nobody on KMC has ever leaned so heavily on a thesaurus I believe.

-AC

A lot of great writers have made hundreds of grammar mistakes in their first editions - grammar has got nothing to do with intelligence anyway. If you need a thesaurus to read my stuff, you aren't very literate. I think you just don't understand my theories and now resort to pointing out grammar sh*t.

I just think you can't admit that he's right rolleyes1

"I wrote a big deal of philosophical ideas in this forum, you on the other hand have nothing to show - you only criticise me as you have nothing original to say. Anyway, I got a lot of compliments in this forum from other members about my philosophy, also in other forums - peterKSL is one of them - one of the few here who can talk philosophy."

I have posted in the philosophy forum before, when it was more than just people coming in saying "I'm smart". Like you.

PeterKSL? You mean the same guy who believes that homosexuality is a disease that should be cured? The same guy who hates gay people coz they're different? Yeah he's a real sharp tool.

I'm not saying you shouldn't post philosophies or such, that's the point of the forum. I just don't think (for someone who has a number of spottable faults from the outset) you should be coming on and immediately saying that you are a genius among idiots, that's all. Having a bunch of philosophical theories does not make you any special. Asking questions with no answers is just a cowardly way to not get proven wrong.

Anyway, perfection:

"We can achieve the things we want to perfection."

It's referring to complete and total perfection. Not neccessarily a task that can be labelled perfect due to a quantity of application or effort.

-AC

O <---- perfection 😉

Alpha - I'm sorry, but I can't argue with someone who's against philosophers asking questions for which there are 'no answers'.