Official Spiderman 3 Updates & News thread

Started by VeNoIIvII114 pages

hey its just what ive herd..doesnt mean its true......i just herd she is leaving...

Its the same I have heard as well. It all really depends on how she feels after Spider-Man 3 and in my opinion she will probably then renegotiate her contract for a larger paycheck. When that is done then it will up to Sony whether they want to pay her that certain amount.

Dunst,Maguire and Franco will all be gone after SM-3.

Count on it.

if MJ dies..do you rekon they'll do a flip of the comics...meaning...like..instead of Gwen as first love, then MJ, they'll do MJ as first love, then Gwen? and then gwen gets merked in 6 by the return of teh goblin....i know..its really off from the history...but its not like they've kept with the context in the other movies

MJ won't die.Raimi has spent so much time building up the relationship that he won't abruptly end it by killing her off.

He obviously has a thing for Peter and MJ since he spends so much time with the dreary slow loves scenes.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Dunst,Maguire and Franco will all be gone after SM-3.

Count on it.

I doubt Franco will be gone unless they decide to write him out of the franchise.

Harry's going to die in SM-3.Death of another Goblin.

You wait and see.

Also Harry died in the comics too.Perfectly reasonable to assume he will in the movie.

If MJ was going to be the love Peter loses she would have died on that bridge in SM-1.

The only way Kirsten Dunst is leaving is if she ends up asking for too much money or if they decide to substitute her character for another love interest. I am almost sure Raimi is not going to simply kill off Harry in Spider-Man 3, if its going to happen it will be in Spider-Man 4.

What is Harry going to do in SM-4???

And you're forgetting two things:

1.Franco will be too old to play the role,as will the others by the time SM-4 comes around.In about 2010.

2.Dunst has publically said she's finished after SM-3.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
What is Harry going to do in SM-4???

And you're forgetting two things:

1.Franco will be too old to play the role,as will the others by the time SM-4 comes around.In about 2010.

2.Dunst has publically said she's finished after SM-3.

Actually your forgetting that Sony is doing 6 films and Raimi has expressed interest in doing Spider-Man 4 plus more and because of this I doubt Raimi will merely kill him off. Raimi didn't even kill of Ock's character in Spider-Man 2 and its doubtful he will kill off Harry in the 3rd.

Franco will not be too old to play the role, he will only be 32 years old and 31 if it is filmed in 2009. Unless you consider 31-32 years old to be a senior citizen then 31-32 years of age is not even remotely old. As for the rest of the cast, Tobey will only be between 34-35 years old and Dunst will be even younger than Franco at 28-29 years old. Besides I would understand your point if Franco and the cast looked 10 years older than what they actually are, but they don't.

Like I said before, just because Dunst said she might leave after Spider-Man 3 it doesn't mean she isn't going to be in anymore Spider-Man films after the 3rd. Many actors say the same yet they find themselves coming back for more, just like Pierce Brosnan said he wouldn't do anymore Bond films yet he still came back to do "Die Another Day." Dunst will likely try to renegotiate her contract after the 3rd for a larger amount of money and its not like Sony can not afford to pay her more since they are already paying Tobey 20 mil each.

Franco will look too old.Harry is supposed to be in his early 20's.

Look at the difference in Franco between SM-1 and SM-2.He looked so much more mature in 2.And that was just a 2 year gap.

As for Maguire at 35 years old if he still retains his youthful looks that he has now I will be DAMN impressed and surprised.

Dunst will be gone after 3.No two ways about it.And good riddance to her.She's a useless MJ.

Franco was suppose to look more mature and older for Spider-Man 2 it was all part of his character. Remember he was suppose to be in charge of a billion dollar company and going through enormous stress, frustration, depression, and anger after his father was murdered and his one and only best freind was working with his father's murderer. It was basically required for him to look the way he did.

You also have to remember that these aren't the comic books where the chracters constantly remain the same age, the script can't have the characters being 23 forever.

As for Tobey Maguire, I'm not a fortune teller so I can't promise you he will still look the same 5 years from now, but if he takes care of himself I am sure he can keep the same youthful look.

Once again like I said, its not 100% sure whether Dunst is leaving after the 3rd film, only time will tell. Not that that I don't want her and her character to leave (I really do) I'm just saying that we don't know anything yet.

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Franco was suppose to look more mature and older for Spider-Man 2 it was all part of his character. Remember he was suppose to be in charge of a billion dollar company and going through enormous stress, frustration, depression, and anger after his father was murdered and his one and only best freind was working with his father's murderer. It was basically required for him to look the way he did.

You also have to remember that these aren't the comic books where the chracters constantly remain the same age, the script can't have the characters being 23 forever.

As for Tobey Maguire, I'm not a fortune teller so I can't promise you he will still look the same 5 years from now, but if he takes care of himself I am sure he can keep the same youthful look.

Once again like I said, its not 100% sure whether Dunst is leaving after the 3rd film, only time will tell. Not that that I don't want her and her character to leave (I really do) I'm just saying that we don't know anything yet.

any chance she'll leave before it?

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Franco was suppose to look more mature and older for Spider-Man 2 it was all part of his character. Remember he was suppose to be in charge of a billion dollar company and going through enormous stress, frustration, depression, and anger after his father was murdered and his one and only best freind was working with his father's murderer. It was basically required for him to look the way he did.

My point exactly.What do you think he'll look like in 5 years time???

Certainly not like the youthful Osborn of the comics.That goes for Maguire too.

After SM-3 Sony will be looking for new blood.Wait and see.

the return of goblin is spiderman subtitle, harry will die on it, but in the end a dark shadow wil be on his tomb (norman) ,this scene is after the last sccene, when peter and mj marry ( leaked script)

and more attention will be given to doc connors in this movie, he will be doing his experiments (maybe a intro ,reserved) for lizard on sm4?

Lizard and Venom sweet Jesus that would be sweet!

what venom? venom is eddie gay brock with a *** alien, if the alien is on spiderman 4 it will be on spiderman

yeah but Spidey will ditch it and it'll be on Brock...both Brock and symbo hate the wall crawler...their hate shall form the union of Venom

dude for venom they must like many ppl want, a spin off, becouse they cant show eddie anger for peter in one movie, since brock wasnt even shown, do u expect us to acept , that eddie just come into scene jealous of peter habilities in taking spidey pics?
no way, i´d rather have no simbiote, or only in spiderman5. or make a venom movie AWAY from spiderman world.