Batman is gonna suck

I'm sorry but when you have someone like Katie Holmes playing a love interest instead of Halle Berry it just doesn't work 🙁

I dont even think Halle Berry would be a good Catwoman in the upcoming movie. Are you sure KAtie Holmes will be in it? the one from Tititan?

Yup Katie Holmes the from Dawson's Creek remember?

Halle Berry is an ugly looking dog.I am wondering if the director of catwoman is related to tim burton because she rivals michael keaton as the worst casting choice in comicbook history.The only thing I feel that will suck about the new batman movie is what they have done to the batmobile.Otherwise i am excited about it because this time they got a director who cares about making a good casting choice because Bale is physically right for the role of Bruce wayne.

Oh, who cares? Halle Berry wasn't in the first two Batman films, which everyone seems to love so much [I don't, but that's another story], and she's eight years older than the star. More to the point, it's inane to declare that a movie will suck because a certain actress isn't given what is, after all, only a supporting role. Pardon my bluntness.

Anyone who has muscles and a good chin can play Batman as for Halle Berry is beautiful and looks alot better than teen soap opera star Katie Holmes

I am worried about Katie too...She seems...imature...not the kind of girl Bruce would be interested in...but we'll see.

Scarecrow? I would rather see CROC

Scarecrow is a good villian, he is number 3 on my all time fav Bat villians, over Croc, the Riddler, Bane and others,

MY top 3 are

Joker
TwoFace
Scarecrow. He was cool in Batman tas, best showings are fear of victory,
and Dreams of Darkness. IF they have Scarecrow like that, than they are almost home free in the Super villian thing.

Thats almost true but they are never faithful all the way when it comes to villains just look at Green Goblin and Magneto

You could be right, but if they do him right in other words read a few comic books on the Scarcrow, he could be a great movie villian.

What bothers is that it's not just Scarecrow as the villian, or Ra's a Ghul, but the Scarecrow and Ghul. I don't know why it was decided that one villian per film somehow isn't enough, but I disagree--especially, as seems to be the case with Batman Begins, a lot of other stuff is going on as well. I do not intend, however, to let that spoil the film for me.

That was one of the things that ruin the first set of movies. It got so Bad that in the 4th movie, Bane, Ivy and Freeze were a team.

One Villian a movie.

I think Batman needs to take a lesson from Spider-Man and have only one villain in the movie after all you can't argue with results. It also gives more time in the movie to concentrate on the characters and story 😉

Batman is suppose to start all over so if they mess up again we will never see Batman for at least another ten years I'm afraid it will all be over very soon. 😕

yeah why can't batman films have 1 villan?!!!!
any logical explanation?

The explanation is that they are still living in the images of the 3rd and 4th movies and can't even try to be different I thought it was called Batman Begins not Batman End? 😠

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
The explanation is that they are still living in the images of the 3rd and 4th movies

The trend was started with the second movie.

True but it didn't get ridiculous until the third movie and by the way I hope scarecrow actually looks like scarecrow and not a normal man walking around. 😉

They should just pretend that Joker didn't die in the first movie and make another with him.

Or pretend that Joker and Two-Face didn't die and make a four hour long 'Dark Knight Returns: The Movie'

edit: Mel Gibson as Batman and Jack Nicolson again for Joker, if they made a DKR movie, btw.