Alpha Centauri
A) If everyone was unsure then they should have opened their eyes and learned before opening their mouthes and being all gung-ho about taking out someone who they were just being told was a threat.
1] What do you mean opened their eyes? The United Nations' weapons inspectors were lead in circles by Saddam. Inspectors were always held for a time before they could inspect the factories or any where they wanted to inspect - this isn't how weapons inspection works. Some inspections at certain facilities were not even allowed. This went on for about 10 YEARS. Damn, weapons inspection went on again BEFORE any attack started. If Saddam cooperated fully with *U.N.* weapons inspectors than there would be NO WAR. He agreed and then in March 2003 he didn't complied with some of the demands - trying to lead the inspectors in circles again/not fully cooperating. Bush was tired of this - ten years of this, even when given a chance to redeem himself (Saddam) - and so the war began. THERE WAS NO GUNG-HO ANYTHING!
B) No one knew for sure Saddam didn't have nukes. No one knew for sure that he did, but they went ahead anyway with believing it and going in there. Chances are the powers that be knew he didn't, but the public of America as always in these situations, needed so little reason to give their approval. Only until now are people seeing it was bullshit. Call me crazy but I think it's too late. Yeah Saddam is out of power but at what cost?
Chances are? So little reason?
- Little reasons like Saddam's uncooperation with U.N. weapons inspector for 10 YEARS!?
- Little reasons like the fact that he hated America & wanted nukes to threaten us & his neighboring countries?
- Little reason's like invading Kuwait (neighboring country) & like using chemical weapons (like Sarine Gas) on HIS OWN people (different ethnic groups)?
- Little reasons like the chemical weapons he used on the Iranian people (neighboring country) during the Iran/Iraq War?
- Little reasons like the fact that he's a tyrant - cruel to his own people and a threat to the international community?
America helped rebuild, yeah. But at the price of getting what they want, when they want it, from every country they help. Coz America is a no gain, no give country.
At what price? Try $100 BILLION U.S. TAX PAYER MONEY just for starters: that's the amount currently for rebuilding Iraq. And even more moneys needed later.
No give? Where were the Europeans when there was genocide of the Muslim population by the Serbs (Christian) in the Balkins/Bosnia in 1999? Did these rich countries even lifted a finger to help their neighbors, their fellow humans? WHERE THE HELL WERE THEY!?
America - from across the FREAKEN ATLANTIC - was the country that intervened - thus stopping the massacre from continuing. And what did we - the United States of America - gain from the Balkins? Oil? Gold? Valuable resources? NADA! That's what we got. There wasn't anything valuable to gain - we went their with the intent to STOP THE GENOCIDE OF ONE GROUP BY ANOTHER! Again, where were the rich Europeans when this happened - those o so great Europeans. Those Europeans who America saved during WWI & WWII and now are criticizing America for wanting to protect itself from global threats.
You're an admitted patriot, so before you claim I don't know anything, take a look at the country you're protecting.
I did. It's not perfect (no country is), but it's still the best country in the world. And before you try to say anything else, America went to war against the government of Iraq & Saddam, not it's citizens. Yes there's thousands of Iraqi's dead, but you think Saddam was a merciful leader? This guy killed hundred thousands of his people through genocide & stole billions of oil revenue from the country, Iraq was worse under Saddam.
_________________________________________________________
Magee
The thing is the USA waged war on terrorism/Iraq because there was a minor chance that they were in possesion of nuclear bombs or chemical weapons. So using the same logic the US used should the world go to war with them because as u say beyonder "they have the most nuces in the world." Screw that lets just have a world war to try and get rid of every country with them.
Russia, China, Great Britain, France, India, Pakastan, Israel all have nukes. Do you see America going after any of them just cause they have them? Why? Because they pose no threat to other countries.
North Korea & possibly Iran have them. America's going after them if possible 'cause they're radical and would use them. Hell, North Korea launched a missile (not containing nuke warhead) over Japan just to show Japan and the world that they can hit Japan & isn't affraid to use it. North Korea hates the United States and has threaten its neighbor South Korea.
Because the way i see it is America is just as likely, if not more in my opinion do use nuces on any country. I mean at the end of the day what country is gonna stand up to the US? Maybe if it was Russia but any other country's pretty much dun for if America decides they dont like em.
There's a handful of countries that have nukes, but we DON'T go around bullying other countries, threatening them with nukes if we don't get what we want. These countries are the RESPONSIBLES, countries like North Korea or Iraq (if they had it) aren't.