(PS2/X-Box/Gamecube/PC) Which is Best?

Started by §pearhead16 pages

This has been done many times...but I'll say PS2, cuz it's the only one I have

granted, I have a PC, but I only play Starcraft and Brood War on it 😬

PC is the best thing ever. It does everything the other systems do, only better.

The price kinda sucks, but it's capabilities are far greater...

xbox for sure

xbox for games... PC for the games that require a mouse

PS2.Its the only system with a variety/good RPGs.X box is just...boring,nothing remotly well plotted.Gamecube is ok,but most of the games are kinda kiddie...

im going with PS2 only bcause they got better games. ✅

viva la revolution 🤘

X-box for FPS.

PC just because it is the easiest to get games and easiest for online play but xbox is tight as well

Originally posted by WindDancer
X-box for FPS.
The human eye can't interpret anything above 87 FPS or so, so 400 FPS isn't going to make a difference if we can't see the difference. Forget where I heard that, but I'm pretty sure that's true.

Originally posted by JKozzy
The human eye can't interpret anything above 87 FPS or so, so 400 FPS isn't going to make a difference if we can't see the difference. Forget where I heard that, but I'm pretty sure that's true.

FPS = first person shooter
he didnt mean frames per second... I dont think...

I like them all for at least one or two reasons, so I really have no point in choosing.

Oh, heh. Didn't think of that 😛

In that case, I haven't tried shooters for Xbox, so I can't judge that yet.

name some good X-box FPS

Ps-2 because it has more variety in there games, a crap load more games, and far better game developers

X-box for graphics, ps2 for games, gamecube for multiplayer, and pc for online play. need i say more?

Originally posted by Fearnix
name some good X-box FPS

i don't know.... Halo... Unreal tourney... soldier of fortune 2 .... just for starters.... Doom and Starcraft ghost are to be ported to X-box to... every decent PS2 FPS, Xbox already has like Time Splitters...

most of the game companies PS2 once held are sharing with X-box now so i don't see the difference in that...

Originally posted by JKozzy
The human eye can't interpret anything above 87 FPS or so, so 400 FPS isn't going to make a difference if we can't see the difference. Forget where I heard that, but I'm pretty sure that's true.

First Person Shooter. 😛

Originally posted by RaventheOnly
i don't know.... Halo... Unreal tourney... soldier of fortune 2 .... just for starters.... Doom and Starcraft ghost are to be ported to X-box to... every decent PS2 FPS, Xbox already has like Time Splitters...

most of the game companies PS2 once held are sharing with X-box now so i don't see the difference in that...

Also House of the Death III, Armed and Dangerous, Silent Scope complete (which looks okay on both consoles)

Originally posted by RaventheOnly
i don't know.... Halo... Unreal tourney... soldier of fortune 2 .... just for starters.... Doom and Starcraft ghost are to be ported to X-box to... every decent PS2 FPS, Xbox already has like Time Splitters...

most of the game companies PS2 once held are sharing with X-box now so i don't see the difference in that...

yeah but the same goes for x-box. Game developers for the box shift to PS2 quite often.

which ones? Tom Clancy is the only ones i can think of that brang Splinter cell to PS2 but its graphics were diminished greatly