Darth Maul Debate

Started by Rogue Jedi4 pages

maul has a really cool background. while it is not CANON with the films, it is very interesting:
species: zabrak
homeworld: iridonia
age: mid 20's
according to one website, and again, i know this is not CANON, sidious tracked down maul when he was a child, then known as Khameir Sarin, who was force sensitive but had not been tested by the republic. when khameir was 12, sidious revealed himself to the youth. as a test of strength, sidious convinced khameir to lay an ambush for some of his friends., to test his strength. unknown to maul, 7 jedi had been lured to the ambush scene, rather than khameirs friends. the jedi were ambushed and struck back in self defense. khameir had no choice but to retaliate, leavung what remained of the small band of jedi for dead.

Maul kicks ass, I was so dissapointed to see him die,If anyone should have been Jar Jar Binks! Maul would have been a better character to extended in the second and third movies. He was just meaner cooler, and looked more menacing then Duku. Maul was bad ass enough to kill Quan Ji, and rock Obi-Wan. A matter afact he beat Obi-Wan, and was only killed because of his on cockness. Maul should not have been defeated so quickly. Would have been better that Anakin killed Maul and then Duku be introduced.

Originally posted by SuperDarryl
Maul kicks ass, I was so dissapointed to see him die,If anyone should have been Jar Jar Binks! Maul would have been a better character to extended in the second and third movies. He was just meaner cooler, and looked more menacing then Duku. Maul was bad ass enough to kill Quan Ji, and rock Obi-Wan. A matter afact he beat Obi-Wan, and was only killed because of his on cockness. Maul should not have been defeated so quickly. Would have been better that Anakin killed Maul and then Duku be introduced.

i can see that. maul and annie dueling in attack of the clones. first, it would be obi wan and maul, round 2....maul would not make the same mistakes as he did in the phantom menace. maul would defeat obi wan, just like dooku did. annie would jump in, saving obi wan, just like he did in ep.2. then, annie would duel with maul with two sabers against mauls dual blades. he would kill maul, avenging qui gon jinn. dooku would then be introduced at the end of ep.2, as sidious's new apprentice.

in a star wars tales comics luke goes to iridonnia and he sees a ghost of darth maul and he finds out that a zabrak is keeping maul´s brain so he is living(artificially at least) until luke shuts him down

that sux.

Maul and the screwy jedi freak

Yo
Darth Mauls death was friggen unfair.
Obi wan took his masters lightsaber and Maul had his lightsaber broken really I think Maul should have won!!!!! 😒

Maul stood there yes but he was the most awsome character 😍
I WANT HIM BACK I WANT HIM BACK!!!
sorry I had sugar
Being cut in half was the worst way to die worse that Boba fett dieing in a burp in the dessert.

HEY george lucas could you make a cliff hanger thingy and bring him back?!!!
I even have an Idea to bring him back along with a story afterwards.

Let Maul die an honolrable death and stay away from CHEATING SCREWY JEDI SCUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😈 😈 😈 👽 👽 👽 🤣

umm at least in EU boba fett didnt die in the sarlacc...
maul had to die cause in the novel it was important because obi-wan while hanging there had realized that he was "trying" so he calmed himself down and he focused on "doing". maul was watching obi-wan calm down which confused him (as seen by the stupid look he makes before obi-wan jumps up) and is not concentrating on the battle...
i wanted him to live to but it was pivitol in obi-wans rise to becoming a jedi-knight

wait wait wait - HOW can u say that DMauls death was unfair? He cheated to beat Qui-Gon. He hit him in the chin - if he was good enough to beat Q, he wouldnt have needed to do that... not only that - if ObiWan wasnt slow - and they hadnt been separated Maul would be in alot more pieces than 2... and on that note if Obi and Q could run superfast away from the droidekas, why couldnt he do that then? but anyway... I always always thought Qui-Gon let himself die, because he just stops fighting, and looks at darth maul, and barely tries to block his swings from that point on. so i think Darth Maul recieved a death far more fair than he deserved

Originally posted by Assassin Maul
I think it was unfair.

Unfair, he deserved every bit of what he got. Maul cheated in the first place by using a force push, after obi chopped his saber. Obi would have killed his sorry ass anyway.

no my clone should not have died!

Originally posted by Mace Skywalker
Unfair, he deserved every bit of what he got. Maul cheated in the first place by using a force push, after obi chopped his saber. Obi would have killed his sorry ass anyway.

If he was a real cheating sith ........wouldnt he have thought "screw the lightsabre" and just do a force choke on both Qui Gone and Obi wan?
Or do you reckon he wanted to fight.......as the stare he gave a meditating Qui GONE was similar to the stare you get off most of the locals in my local pub if you spill their pint.

I like the idea of Dooku and i rate Christopher Lee......the scene between himself and Mcgregor is a sw highlight but the fight scene was just SO badly edited and so unconvincing.
AND kids just didnt get him
They just thought he was some old fossil coming after the nastiness and ULTRA coolness of Maul.

Originally posted by Darth Revan
It was his own fault for being overconfident. Plus, "fair" doesn't matter in duel to the death.

I agree

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cylob49
[B]Or do you reckon he wanted to fight

after years of training i guess he wanted to have a duel with the real deal.
Obi Wan was on the up so yeah true he prob thought screw this and did the force push

Originally posted by Lames.s.
Dooku had much more depth. I would have been happy to see him as the only Sith apprentice in the PT. Maul was great in the action sequences, but overall....un-necessary.

Dooku had more depth because he was written with more depth.
And there is no fair or unfair in this type of duel. Maul lost because he became over confident and under estimated Obi-Wan.

Darth Maul was a wasted opportunity. I know it's Lucas thing and all, but he really should have had a Sith Lord that was THE MAN before Vader, and then have an almighty fight between Darth Maul and Darth Vader for the Emperors right hand.

Just IMAGINE that. With Vader winning. Imagine the mixed emotion, the whole "Yaaaayy! NooooooO!".

Back before the PT was made, there were EU stories of Vader killing not only Jedi, but cutting down The Sith aswell, which I thought would have been AMAZING.

When I saw Maul, I thought "Vader'll take him out in Ep.3" - but instead they kill him off so those horrible creatures could have their happy ending. Urgh.

This is like Boba Fett all over again.

nope it was a derserving death because he had killed two jedi even before qui-gonn in episode1 when he was track down some jedi that something that darth sidious wanted also he was taken when young from world that was made of fire so he would have been evil either way that's my take on it.

🤨

Darth Maul and Jar ajr binks were the two worst things about the first movie.Thank god Maul was not in the last one.Darth maul was a stupid villian.He was not at all a believeable villain like Darth Vader was.He looked like one of those wrestlers out of wwf.Like someone else said earlier,he was a wasted character.I could not help but laugh everytime I saw him. 😄

dont judge by looks.

There's another thing to consider as well. You know how Maul's duel sabre is cut in half and he fights on with just a 'regular' lightsabre? I've done some research and apparently it is VERY difficult to switch from one style of weapon to another like that in the middle of a fight (e.g. switching from a staff to a sword). It requires a complete reorientation of posture, mindset etc. Yet Maul does it with ease. Shows how skilled he is.

Really, if he hadn't gotten cocky, Obi-Wan would have been finished.