Originally posted by lucija
Texas Massacre was full of blood and parts of human bodies, it was quite cheap horror but I liked it. And it was according to real event. 🐰
The remake perhaps, the original (and best) was virtually devoid of any blood. And yes, about 5% of the movie is based on actual events.
Any subsequent prequels are destined to fail.
I think the director of the chainsaw remake that came out a while ago with Jessica Beil should not be let anywhere near a possible script. His movie. It was lame and over the top(Micheal Bay pressure no doubt) with maybe and exception with the guy who played the sherrif(Full Metal Jacket)Original Chainsaw massacre never had a drop of blood in it, something to fool the censors with and part2 was made because hooper said for the freedom of gore now and because nobody got the humor of the first one. If anybody should make a prequel Hooper should. Maybe Rob Zombie since the guy has almost blatantly copied Hooper's style for HOTC. Anybody else would ruin it with there ever popular " a thousand shots a second" crap with a sountrack that doesn't even allow any pacing. Part 3,4 were even worse. A prequel should have Bill Mosely in it(Chop Top) to at least give it some balls. Maybe he could play a deranged uncle or something. Hooper should get off his ass and stop frigging about with the whole Toolbox Murders crap wihich seem to be going nowhere anyways. 🍺 😠 😮💨