I doubt it. Think about it - Bond 20 was pretty much as big as the producers could make it: it had Brosnan, Halle Berry, and loads of sly, 20th anniversary references for the fans. How can Bond 21 possibly make more money? With a differnt Bond, that's how. And THAT's why I believe that Brosnan is gone for good...
Originally posted by dber
You are a bit of an idiot with your ageist comment.😠
and you are a bit of rude? 🙄
from the FORUM RULES (better follow them ✅ )
Courtesy
Don't attack others. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack.
Besides it's not an ageist comment; there are limits in physical things an actor can or cannot do, based on their AGE. If you don't agree with that please justify it 😐
let's bring Antony Hopkins to be Bond 😐