/\ there were plans to assassinate hitler, and they could have done it, but the governments at the time realised that if they killed him, a more competent military leader would take his place and be more dangerous. They wanted hitler to stay where he was, because he was making so many bad decisions, making it easier for the allied war effort.
Dunno but the First World War would have happened anyway. I mean the murdering of the arch duke was just a futile catalyst that almost anything could and probably would have triggered it
However maybe the winners would have been different.
Link if you wanted to stop WWII I think you have a better chance if you killed AH
We can learn from history how past generations thought and acted, how they responded to the demands of their time and how they solved their problems. We can learn by analogy, not by example, for our circumstances will always be different than theirs were. The main thing history can teach us is that human actions have consequences and that certain choices, once made, cannot be undone. They foreclose the possibility of making other choices and thus they determine future events.
Would I fix all the wrongs? Certainly not.
Re: If you could go back in time to fix all the wrongs, would you?
Originally posted by BlackC@t
I'm pretty much talking about 'The Butterfly Effect' thingy here, you have blackouts when your a kid so you write everything down in journels then reliese you can go back in time to fix the wrongs, would you?I would.
not in a million years.
you dont want to fu.ck with fate.
even a single molecule's position beeing changed in the past is like throwing a pebble in the watter, at first small waves appear that upset the water, slowly with the passing of time they spread over the surface of the water, only thing is that these waves unlike the real thing, get bigger wider and taller as they move along and the more time passes the bigger they grow.