if you dont want nudity specify, you cant expect "REAL ART" to be nonsense were every thing is puppie's and flower's and such.
yes you have the right to like whatever you want, but so do other's art is what you see fit.
if you want to have a thread clear of nudity then specify. like LANDCAPE's and still art or somthing.
here ill start you of with a pic
Originally posted by silver_tears
how precisely is a fruit art 🙄
I'm sorry but you are 26 yet you are shy about the body 🤨No one is forcing you to look at or do anything with it, you don't like it feel free to stay away from the threads which you may consider to have such content!
Yes Im 26 and Im not shy about my body. As a matter a fact I'm a very healthy woman who is in perfect physical shape. For me artist that paint naked woman are just inmature males with fast hormones. I mean come on! Males love to enjoy watching naked women all the time.
Originally posted by Xena fan
Yes Im 26 and Im not shy about my body. As a matter a fact I'm a very healthy woman who is in perfect physical shape. For me artist that paint naked woman are just inmature males with fast hormones. I mean come on! Males love to enjoy watching naked women all the time.
If that's your take on every male in society then you're greatly mistaken.
Originally posted by silver_tears
and therefore males who paint males are what 🤨
Originally posted by Trinity_Matrix
You know, if you don't like it, no one's making you look at it...And the human body is one of the hardest things to draw, that's why art of people is usually so much more famous than still lifes and landscapes.
Honey, certain males need to be censor in art. To them is all a big thrill to watch a naked woman. Women need to realise that in the past males only kept in mind two things 1. conquering 2. making women house slaves.
You can quite see it today. Art is another way for male artist to get away with their silly little thrills.
See, you think we act like little children because we post great works of art that happen to be of naked people. We realize that the nudity isn't there for the sake of nudity. We are mature enough to be able to discuss art like this without just staring at the more, erm... private.. parts of the body. If you honestly can't look at "David" without thinking that it's porn, you are missing out on something. You're not supposed to look at his genitals, you're supposed to look at his facial expression, his posture, and his musculature. I was probably 5 or 6 when I first saw this stuff. Where, you ask? In my grade school art class. 🙄
Originally posted by VENOMfan
if you dont want nudity specify, you cant expect "REAL ART" to be nonsense were every thing is puppie's and flower's and such.
yes you have the right to like whatever you want, but so do other's art is what you see fit.if you want to have a thread clear of nudity then specify. like LANDCAPE's and still art or somthing.
here ill start you of with a pic
i will repeat myself, beauty is in the eye's of the beholder. i have yet to see "PORN" displayed in this forum, you may need to start living out side of the box, all of this work has had obvious dedication and skill
they wanted to communicate a messeage, Michelangelo did, HG Giger did
just becuase you dont like it is no reason to dilusionilize what your looking at
Originally posted by Xena fan
Once again you personal Vendetta has started! All I ask for people to start posting beautiful art! YOU GUYS ARE GETTIN OFF TOPIC! Keep it up and I WILL REPORT YOU ALL FOR NOT STAYING ON TOPIC!Back topic please.
Originally posted by Xena fan
Honey, certain males need to be censor in art. To them is all a big thrill to watch a naked woman. Women need to realise that in the past males only kept in mind two things 1. conquering 2. making women house slaves.You can quite see it today. Art is another way for male artist to get away with their silly little thrills.
What about male artists who paint males? And female artists? What does that, in your opinion, mean? It's not about the nudity. Nudity in artwork is NOT considered pornographic if it is does in good taste, as it has been in the examples posted.
I've been in art classes all my life, and will major in art at the university, so I don't see the problem in it. "Real" art encompasses many, many things, from the examples posted here, to sculptures, to animation and comics, to graphic design, to silly little sketches that I like to do.
And honestly, when I was in middle school and took an art class, we looked at paintings like the ones posted here and my class, which was primarily 11 and 12 year olds, had a more mature reaction than yours about them.