Belief

it doesn't says so in the 1st post it says so in: "I was trying to keep this free of the God debate."

Originally posted by Fire
TpT was just sharing his discussion, he afterwards clearly stated he wants this discussion to be free of the god debate.

🙂 Ok, but thats now what you said.

not following that last part but okie

Becuz you were saying TP was trying to keep it from debate, then you turned it around and said YOU were trying to keep it out of a God debate, when in fact you did say TP said it, which HE never did in the 1st post.

This is not a you did-you didn' t game.

It is now.

TpT stated he was trying to keep this free of the God debate. It doesn' t matter whether he said so in his first post or not. Period.

lol srry didn't mean to make it like that.

still believ 2+2= 4 still belive the bible to be fictional myths.
still belive those found of philosophical sceptism can pay 5 one dollar bills for a 2 dollar burger.

bUt Does Believing it mean its true? And you only base belief on past experience, whose to say that it will be like that in the future? You assume that, but there's nothing stopping it.

Cyclops tried to pull this Philosophical crap on me yesterday...

He was like "Proove I exsist"

and aside from the numerous PMs, the didigtal photos he's posted, and the girlfriend of his that talks to me reguarly...he just refused to believe that THAT was sufficient enough proof. He just kept saying "proove I exsist"

It's not EXACTLY the same as the 2+2=4 analogy, but it does have similarities.

All philosophical scepticism, very tiresome indeed.

yea it is, but it is more "practical" when talking in the future tense.

bUt Does Believing it mean its true

He just kept saying "proove I exsist

Well you are talking to him, so somethign that expressis his opinions must exist in some way shape or form

Originally posted by Linkalicious
Cyclops tried to pull this Philosophical crap on me yesterday...

He was like "Proove I exsist"

and aside from the numerous PMs, the didigtal photos he's posted, and the girlfriend of his that talks to me reguarly...he just refused to believe that THAT was sufficient enough proof. He just kept saying "proove I exsist"

It's not EXACTLY the same as the 2+2=4 analogy, but it does have similarities.

Go to his house and hit him in the face. 😄 Sometimes a complex question requires a simple answer. 😉

Originally posted by Linkalicious
Cyclops tried to pull this Philosophical crap on me yesterday...

He was like "Proove I exsist"

and aside from the numerous PMs, the didigtal photos he's posted, and the girlfriend of his that talks to me reguarly...he just refused to believe that THAT was sufficient enough proof. He just kept saying "proove I exsist"

It's not EXACTLY the same as the 2+2=4 analogy, but it does have similarities.

The Benefactor is sending the Guardians after you 🪩

Originally posted by BackFire
You're friend is wrong and over analyzing things (something I know alot of phylosophy majors do, as if it makes them seem intelegent in some way).

2+2 does in fact equal 4. By our number system, this is indeed fact. For proof of this, take two apples, and then put two more apples with them. You now have four apples. You do not have seven apples. No matter what you believe, or where in the universe you do this, if you take 2+2, there will always be the same amount of apples.

I think what he meant was that it is only four because we have decided ((believe)) that this number is four. If we believed it to be seven, it would be seven. (('1984' kinda deal - Winston believes 2+2 is 5, therefore 2+2 IS 5, at least for him))

Originally posted by finti
no it doesnt, I bet Britney Spears BELIEVES she is the best musical artist ever aint so though

It is true for her - what other truth is there but your own truth?

it aint even true for her one has to be realistic too