bet after the 1st world war, people said that there wont be another one cos the countrys wont be so stupid next time...wrong wrong wrongwe are more enlightened these days, no no one can say that a WW III not gonna happen, but WWIII will be fought on a very differnt scenario than the previous WW of last century
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Who cares. without electricity i think there would be many suicides. People would be faced with manual labor. I mean i know i would probably sit sadness and fear of actually having to work without relying on a computer, but then i would run down the streets naked,covered in honey. just my way of getting over the end of the world
you do not understand ❌ i hit your country with an EMP ..... and then a nuke..... you can't fire back. and i crush your army and everything of any means of fighting back.... your car doesn't work.... nothing. Its a bomb that doesn't effect the whole world only about city size targets.
E-Bomb Effects(emp)
The United States is drawn to EMP technology because it is potentially non-lethal, but is still highly destructive. An E-bomb attack would leave buildings standing and spare lives, but it could destroy a sizeable military.
There is a range of possible attack scenarios. Low-level electromagnetic pulses would temporarily jam electronics systems, more intense pulses would corrupt important computer data and very powerful bursts would completely fry electric and electronic equipment.
In modern warfare, the various levels of attack could accomplish a number of important combat missions without racking up many casualties. For example, an e-bomb could effectively neutralize:
vehicle control systems
targeting systems, on the ground and on missiles and bombs
communications systems
navigation systems
long and short-range sensor systems