Originally posted by JimMorrison227
In the end, China would beat any country.
😂 China doesn't have enough arms to arm its country 😂 they would be mowed down even though they have numbers on thier side 😂 we proved that in the Korean war our 14,000+ troops held off 200,000 Chinese at the border in the end of South and North 🙂
Originally posted by dean7879
it seems to me that america's arrogence that they can beat anyone will be a costly mistake
i never said we were invincible but it would take the combined might of all of europe to fight us along with a lot of asia just because we have a ocean between us and Landing troops in America would be next to impossible... you couldn't starve us because we are one of the few nations on earth that is totally self sufficient. 😄
Only the aallies who would not fight to begin with... Britian Spain and Italy were with us. Whats Germany and France going to do?first of all without the supprot of yur allies US stand pretty alone out there in the West, US need their allies more than the allies need US
Our technology and tactics allow us to dominate the oceans ... our aircraft alone can sink an entire fleet aloneThe US fleet have one major weakness and it is called submarines, not that the US dont have them I`m talking about the US fleet is extremely vulnerable to submarines.
anyway the topic....ww3
probably will happen but hopefully not in my lifetime
great link http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-overview.htm
The WW3 is been going on in the last 30 years in diferent parts on the planet. I do not think that there would be a global war, but instead this trend of localised conflicts will contniue. The world today is so integrated and powerful interms of atomic weaposn so pressing the button is a lose-lose situation... no winner
But te terrorist threat is here, and those lot are suicider so if they get hold of such weapon then .... we have a diferent situation, what I'm afraid is inavoidable because of the curent world's order... The western countires and USA should pay more attention to their foreigh politics and stands, 3/4 of the world is not going to stay and watch for a long period while 1/4 of the world exploatates and trigers conflict in order to manipulate their natural resources... the responsibility always lies more on the stronger ...
this chap called albert pike predicted that world war 1 and war 2 would happen and also world war 3...
real reasons for all three wars...or just total bollox?
The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions." 2
"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm." 3
After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4
Originally posted by WindDancer
Yeah dean7879, but if one nuclear bomb is all it takes, I guess that if they detonate one in London that would be the end of England. Sorry my good man but ANY nation is a sitting duck in a nuclear explosion. No matter how big their Navy might be.
Actually the nazy is the most resistant to a nuclear explosion ... During the bikini testing out of some 100+ ships only like 7 were sunk from a direct nuclear blast. 😖 of course the radiation would slaughter whoever is left 😄 but.... eh they can still launch thier tomahawks.