I guess it's a matter of opinion. But to me it seemed like the vocalist from NIN was singing so softly and there was hardly any instrumentals.. just doesn't seem like much of a song. I think that if I heard the NIN version first and got used to that before I heard Cash's version my opinion might be different.. but I heard Johnny Cash's version first and I thought the lyrics sounded like an alternative rock song so I looked up who really wrote it.
Yeah, it's just that fuzzy white noise with Trent half-whispering over the top at the beginning. It's supposed to be a quiet song, it's basically a comedown from all the screaming noises of the album, and on that level it works perfectly. Plus he only sings softly in the verses, the rest of the song he sings normally and the guitar gets louder and louder as the song goes on, then gets deafening at the end. It's a perfect close to The Downward Spiral, and Cash didn't (or couldn't) capture the mood of the original.
I guess it's just because NIN are one of those few bands I don't trust other artists to cover.
Yeah but Cash didn't have all the screaming noises in the album to come down from so if he did it all quiet like that it wouldn't have fit perfectly like it did on NIN's album it just would've been some random quiet song in the middle of his cd. I was more surprised he covered Simon and Garfunkel's "Bridge Over Troubled Water" more than anything else.. with his extra deep voice.. just couldn't see him singing that one.
Johnny Cash was in general a badass. Arguably one of the most 'badass' artists of all time. The original may have been darker, but it feels forced. The Cash version is not supposed to be dark, but rather Cash's way of showing his pain. And if it was in a cover, I believe a man who has recorded for that long and wrote that many songs has a right to do a cover.
"I shot a man in Reno/Just to watch him die..."