Originally posted by occultdestroyer
5 cruise ships.. I reckon they're easier to maintain (as long as you adhere to strict check-up/clean-up schedules)And revenues with these things are more consistent, as I see it.
Do you think it was right to ban Lolicon/Toddlercon hentai?
Lolicon, not so much. From what I understand, the females in lolicon are pubescent. Breasts, pubes, etc. Even in hypocritical America, 13 year-olds got married to 30 year old men. There's nothing new there. I'm quite sure that "pubic hair" was a sign mother nature gave us to determine who is "ready to breed" or not. That, and BO are indicators of sexual maturity. Only in the last hundred years have I read about it being morally wrong to have sexual intercourse with young women.
Not that young women are my thing...I prefer fully mature women....at least 20+. I like for the face and the body to be fully developed, etc. The have to look like a woman. That in and of itself could be every bit of a fetish as lolicon, though. So I can't say that my tastes are any healthier than those who like lolicon....both categories have pubescent women...so I guess it doesn't matter.
If I saw a young lady who looked 25, but was actually 15, would it REALLY be considered pedophilia if I didn't know any better? I saw the picture of that "13-year-old" girl that R Kelly pissed on. She looked every bit of 21 to me. 😐
Toddlercon, yes. That's just some sick f***ed up shit. I can't believe something like that existed.
Same question.
People should have the freedom to watch or read anything they like, so no, it shouldn't have been, even if I disagree with it on a personal basis.
Also:
Originally posted by dadudemonNo, it wouldn't, since paedophillia is not applicable for pubescent girls or boys. You wouldn't be considered anything, unless you engaged in sexual contact with her, in which case you'd be a (very vaguely stated) 'sex offender'.
If I saw a young lady who looked 25, but was actually 15, would it REALLY be considered pedophilia
Same Q.