Ask the Person BELOW You a Personal Question.

Started by Time Immemorial4,466 pages
Originally posted by Epicurus
Get back to me when you learn how to construct a proper retort, Supra.

Get back to me when you can answer a question in the question thread.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Get back to me when you can answer a question in the question thread.

?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Will you buy Google Glass?

Nope.

Reiterating my previous question which got overlooked due to Supra's unfortunate troll-derailment of this thread:
Do you prefer petite women or statuesque stunners?

I don't have a preference.

Simpsons or Futurama?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Nope.

Reiterating my previous question which got overlooked due to Supra's unfortunate troll-derailment of this thread:
Do you prefer petite women or statuesque stunners?

I missed that question. And, yes, it was due to the back-and-forth between you and Supra. I am not justifying my mistake just explaining why I missed it.

To answer your question, I prefer tall, athletic women, who have brains.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't have a preference.

Simpsons or Futurama?

Futurama.

It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia or Trailer Park Boys?

Trailer Park Boys

Jersey Shore or Citizen Kane or Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (book)?

Is that a joke? Clearly, not Jersey Shore. Probably Harry Potter because I was bored at times with Citizen Kane.

Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter (movies and books)?

LOTR, but I also like Harry Potter. (and I suppose the question I stated was intended to be humorous, though I don't think it is out of line with some previous questions, additionally I feel like we have strayed far from the "personal" part of the OP, although I do not mind that at all)

SQ

Harry Potter is more enjoyable so I would have to go with HP. LotR can be very boring at times but also very enjoyable at times.

Do you think Time Immemorial and Epicurus should fight, irl?

That would be cute to watch, so yes.

Do you like your job?

Nope.

Does anyone think that the 21st century is going to stagnate in terms of scientific/technological output in the coming decades?

I think it is a possibility, but I can't tell. Hard to predict such things, imo.

SQ

No. And I do not believe it is a likely or even slightly likely possibility, either.

Please name something about your body that you think is very aesthetically appealing to you or others?

My shoulder plates.

Same q.

Probably my pecs.

SQ.

My genitalia. It's above average length.

If you lost all your limbs and you're eyesight, would you prefer to die or live the rest of your life as a vegetable?

Die

If you could travel to the future in a time machine, which year would you go to? You spend 1 day in chosen year before being returned to 2014, unless you die.

It would not be a specific data but it would be an idea of the future that I would visit. I would want to visit the future that has humans being immortal OR at least whatever exists of us, as immortal. This means if we upload our consciousness to a digital mind and we all exist as the same entity as a computer, so be it. It could also be biological immortality. That'd be neat, too.

SQ

I'd travel just a couple days at most to gain access on winning lottery numbers.

SQ

Year 2,200 and then I'd get the patents of useful inventions over the last two centuries and become the richest man in the world. **** your lottery tickets.

Last thing you forgot to do?

Drop by the post office to get my parcel.

What material object would give you the most satisfaction besides money?