evolution= false theory.

Started by Mr.Snuggles6 pages

i said 65 million because thats when they actually have "records".

they have no proof its even that old. Carbon dating has already been proven extreeeemely false.

by the way: my first fact is relating to population growth, not the world. If the world is "2 billion" years old that number on"A" would be much greater.

If the world is "2 billion" years old that number on"A" would be much greater.
no, you have to consider the fact that people live much longer now, we are able to cure more people of diseases.
Life aint as harsh and dangerous now as it was so it is just in the latest 50 years that the worlds population have exploded

yes, thats alll accounted for in the book.

then the book is just hogwash

...? whys that. remember: evolution has not been prover right. ITS ONLY A THEORY, and it IS being blown WAY outta proportion.

population growth has all to do about us getting better to treat and prevent diseases, also that our diet is more varied. That aint a theory its a fact, and the plagues this world has seen took its toll of the population too.
Black Plague halved Europes population

which is exactly what this book im reading...📖.... takes into account, smarty 🪩 🤨

well if they took that into acount it is kind of weird they came up with the conclusion they did.
Cant be more people than this planet is able too feed

really? dontcha think its weird scientists say the world is 5 billion or w/e years old?

exatcly.... which proves evolution false...

really? dontcha think its weird scientists say the world is 5 billion or w/e years old?
compare to stories of the bible, no

exatcly.... which proves evolution false...
what proves it wrong

...bible dates back around 6,000 years ago.

1,000 ppl/sq. inch= not enuf to feed.

1,000 ppl/sq. inch= not enuf to feed.
this sounds like a not well thought through result

thanks for your complimant.

😕 ok I guess

...all this disagreement.

Sheesh.

btw viewers: 65 MILLION IS an ESTIMATE used to figure with carbon dating. WELL, carbon dating has been proven reeeally innacurate.