what would you rather.....?

........(courtesy of my friend Katie😄..)

what would you rather....?

1. A guy/girl who was unattractive, but good in bed.....

OR...

2. A guy/girl who was attractive, but bad in bed......

oh they did this on the radio um i duno aye

they did?😑......hmmmm.......

This is a tough one but I think I would take the attractive but bad in bed because I would be afraid of getting HIV from the unattractive.

Originally posted by leatherface12
This is a tough one but I think I would take the attractive but bad in bed because I would be afraid of getting HIV from the unattractive.

Where the feck did you get that stupid theory from?

What a rediculous thing to say?!

I dunno. Jeesh. Im just answering the question.

Well try and not be so ignorant when doing so..i mean gee, where the feck did you hear that, and who from?

I dont know ok. God I was just thinking the first stupid thing that came to my freakin mind. Im sorry if I made you mad.

You didnt make me mad, no reason to make me mad, i was just amazed at your response as ive never heard anyone say anything as rediculous as that.

Ok I didnt really mean that. I was kind of day dreaming while typing that. But I dont know which one I would pick.

same....its hard to choose...but both are so shallow......which is stupid....lol......

I' d go for:
1. A guy/girl who was unattractive, but good in bed.....

am i allowed to use paper bags?

How unatractive are we talking here? Like really hot but not that great in bed compared to 300lb scab face but good in bed? *puke* I'm going to say hot now.

i would pick
#2
hey practice makes perfect 😄

Originally posted by Sigillum_Diaboli
i would pick
#2
hey practice makes perfect 😄

Not for a guy no practice can help him 😄

Im going for unattractive, but hot in bed!! 👆

Whatever does "good/bad in bed" mean? Their attractiveness decides that! 😕

#2

"Good/bad in bed" means how good they can have sex. A

And to answer the question, I dunno...thats a tough one.

Edit..i posted too late