Originally posted by steely balls
godsmack ripped off alice and chains and metallica....metallica wins of course even their latest stuff still proves godsmack sucks
godsmack ripped off alice in chains and not metallica as someone said...
the band's name was taken from an alice in chains song , the band logo is the same as the one of AIC and the first godsmack album has alot of similarities to the AIC sound... and i think i heard that the guys of godsmack started as an AIC cover band, but i'm not shure about this.
is true that metallica's latest work isnt their best (or fan favorities) , but metallica has its place in hard rock/metal history... the master of puppets , lighting and the black album are classics and i dont think godsmack'd ever top that... no matter how much the new metallica album suck ,they're still worth it seeing them live 🤘
dude comparing godsmack to metallica is like comparing good charlotte to led zeppelin. of course metallica is better because theyve been around longer, they know what people like. other than st. anger which is there personal low, godsmack still puts out good music. They both have balls for doing original material. metallica is original in that it introduced real metal to the world and godsmack is original in that they put out an all acoustic cd for a metal band. how many times do you see that? im going to see both bands in november so i will let you know who has a better live show.