Is Ghandi in Hell?

Started by finti42 pages

I am in a devilish mood

There does seem to be a bit of the devil in you, finti......

Ghandi might be in "hell" if Christianity is correct. But if not, or if reality is something much larger, then who knows?

So whats the final verdict? Yes?

Why would u christians automatically assume that Ghandi is in Hell? UR religion is not the only one in the world, nor is it the only correct one neither. Would you people start to understand that there are different religions on the planet with different beliefs, but similiar teachings.

I'm not talking about god or anything. Religion is a way of life and some people accept it and some dont( i'll never condemn anyone for not believing in religion).

SO would people start opening their minds, we've evolved this far already..

oh yeah and Napalm go **** urself.

Very well said Finti. ✅

WHO u talking to ME of FINTI

i'm FINI................NOT finti

man if this wasn't my 'net' name for so many years i would change it so people wouldn't confuse us two.

Originally posted by fini
Why would u christians automatically assume that Ghandi is in Hell? UR religion is not the only one in the world, nor is it the only correct one neither. Would you people start to understand that there are different religions on the planet with different beliefs, but similiar teachings.

I'm not talking about god or anything. Religion is a way of life and some people accept it and some dont( i'll never condemn anyone for not believing in religion).

SO would people start opening their minds, we've evolved this far already..

oh yeah and Napalm go **** urself.

Reasons why Gandhi is in hell:

The universe needs a creator. If it was infinite, it would be impossible as it would have to have an infinite amount of past events, and you couldn't ever reach the present. Quantom Vacuums, are firstly just theoretical, secondly, according to the "Quantom Theory" rich fields of fluctuating energy. They aren't vacuums. They are "Quantom" Vacuums and need to be created. Steven Hawkins conal modal of the universe, whilst not having a singuality, does have a point where there are no events, which is a beginning. Plus he used imaginary numbers (multiples of the square root of one), and when you convert them into real numbers it turns out that there is a singuality. He admits as much in a later book that he co-authored

The creater is singular, as Ockhams Razor (do not ascribe more causes to an event than is nessasary) kills of multiple gods. Therefore it wasn't the Hindu Gods or and other polytheist gods. He was a Hindu wasn't he?

The creator also has to be personal as there were no conditions before the universe that a mindless force could use to begin the universe and enter the infomation (like how air uses heat to get it moving).

He co-authored the book with Roger Penrose.

uhhhh, there is only ONE GOD in hinduism.

OH shit man, we all worship the same God. People eat with their hands or with chop sticks or with forks. But whatever the method they are still eating and no methods are wrong. Same concept for religions

its just that GOD can take many forms and shapes at any given time. God should not be described in HUMAN terms.

IF you want to read, go read up the teachings of Hindusim.

i would change it so people wouldn't confuse us two
yeah imagine the traumas I get because of it
[Reasons why Gandhi is in hell:

The universe needs a creator. If it was infinite, it would be impossible as it would have to have an infinite amount of past events, and you couldn't ever reach the present. Quantom Vacuums, are firstly just theoretical, secondly, according to the "Quantom Theory" rich fields of fluctuating energy. They aren't vacuums. They are "Quantom" Vacuums and need to be created. Steven Hawkins conal modal of the universe, whilst not having a singuality, does have a point where there are no events, which is a beginning. Plus he used imaginary numbers (multiples of the square root of one), and when you convert them into real numbers it turns out that there is a singuality. He admits as much in a later book that he co-authored

The creater is singular, as Ockhams Razor (do not ascribe more causes to an event than is nessasary) kills of multiple gods. Therefore it wasn't the Hindu Gods or and other polytheist gods. He was a Hindu wasn't he?

The creator also has to be personal as there were no conditions before the universe that a mindless force could use to begin the universe and enter the infomation (like how air uses heat to get it moving).


QUANTUM

Originally posted by fini
Why would u christians automatically assume that Ghandi is in Hell? UR religion is not the only one in the world, nor is it the only correct one neither.
No, but most members of this board take a Christian perspective (I assume)
Originally posted by fini
uhhhh, there is only ONE GOD in hinduism.

OH shit man, we all worship the same God. People eat with their hands or with chop sticks or with forks. But whatever the method they are still eating and no methods are wrong. Same concept for religions

its just that GOD can take many forms and shapes at any given time. God should not be described in HUMAN terms.

IF you want to read, go read up the teachings of Hindusim.


Maybe. However, the christian Teachings basically say that other religons are wrong. So if we take it from a Christian Perspective, yes, Ghandi Is going to hell.

Do other religions even call it hell?

Originally posted by fini
uhhhh, there is only ONE GOD in hinduism.

OH shit man, we all worship the same God. People eat with their hands or with chop sticks or with forks. But whatever the method they are still eating and no methods are wrong. Same concept for religions

its just that GOD can take many forms and shapes at any given time. God should not be described in HUMAN terms.

IF you want to read, go read up the teachings of Hindusim.

There are three distinct personalities in Hinduism. Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. They correspond to different times (The beginning, ordering the universe, the end) and so are different entities (a supernatural being that could create the universe must transcend nature, and would not be subject to change except by his own will, which is unlikely for an Uber-God) He also has numerous avatars, each with different personalities.

To ascribe him to the beginning may just whizz round ockham's razor, but when one considers the extra beings that he's composed of, they turn out to be extra causes. Shakti and Ganesha are separate, so they constitute as more causes for the world.

Plus the Hindu scripture of death and rebirth of the universe is scientifically false; no force in physics could reverse the collapse, it's unlikely that there's enough material to slow down the expansion of universe (in fact it's expansion is accelerating) and even if there was it wouldn't work forever; entropy would be conserved from one cycle to the next, making it larger, so if you went back in time eventually you'd find a singularity which is contradictory to Hindu scripture.

Thus, Hinduism doesn't work.

If you don't understand this, just look at the quote. He says God can be in many forms. He compares this to eating. He says God shouldn't be talked about in human terms. His example is in human terms, which is contradictory. Therefore, he cannot be trusted. Only I, the resurrected Hitler Can be trusted. Nazis rule the world! Muhahahaha

WTF are you crazy or something. YOu know that god creating the world in 7 days goes against science too don't you.

And you, Bardock, know that not all Christians believe in the 7-Day creation

well maybe not all hindus belive in the end of the world like that, whats your point?

I thought we were taking this debate from a Christian point of view?

Yes I was responding to Ytaker though.

SOO why dont they call this the CHRISTIAN RELIGION FORUM THEN!?!?!?!?!?!?!

I think frodo there was refering to this thread not the forum you know

No he isn't.

And I'm Christian.