The Butterfly Effect 2

Do you think they should make it but focus it on Evan's grandson or something? and he uses photos instead of journals?
I think they should.

I think it was fine how it was. Leave it at that.

No need for a sequel.

no need for a sequel, and if you saw the Director's Cut, which is how the movie was originally designed to end, then you know there's no way for Evan to have had a son, let alone a grand son...

I didn't like the theatrical endings as much as the director's cut ending, and I doubt a sequel would bring anything fresh and unexplored to the screen... it was perfect as a one-shot.

No need for a sequel and no need for the first film. 👇

Too much sequel-itis in Hollywood. I'd like to see more original movies.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
No need for a sequel.

Exactly.

Sequals ruin the movie. There's no need for one.

Originally posted by <<Solo>>
Exactly.

Ditto!

I liked the first move! But second one would suck beyond...all suckage.

reali ppl??
think about it. if it was evans grand-children or who ever it is reali i think it would be awsome. say someone died and he was looking through old photos and he suddenly went back in time. he wouldn't know what wat happened and he would have to figure it out and find out more about his dad/evan.
if the director did it the right way, i think it would be awsome

ya sequals do ruin the movie but i luv the butterfly effect movie, they should make something similar 2 it........naw then it won't be the only one, nevermind, i shouldn't have voted

Originally posted by spidergrl
reali ppl??
think about it. if it was evans grand-children or who ever it is reali i think it would be awsome. say someone died and he was looking through old photos and he suddenly went back in time. he wouldn't know what wat happened and he would have to figure it out and find out more about his dad/evan.
if the director did it the right way, i think it would be awsome

Once again horrible.

No more Kutcher. 😛

how can you think its horrible <<Solo>>?? i with blackc@t in this one ay!! yes i was admit that normaly sequals do stuck but i think if they made another one it would be wick. and aston didn't do that a bad of job, he could have dodne worse. i reackon teenage evan did well

Originally posted by WindDancer
No need for a sequel and no need for the first film. 👇

so you want a sequal??? or not???
you're just confusing me!!! do you like butterfly effect or wat

He obviously doesn't.......for some odd reason.

What is it with you people? none of you want sequels, did it ever occur to any of you that sometimes sequels are better then the orginals?
if you wont go for a sequel then how about a prequel? with Evan's father? but I bet most of you will say something like 'no need, blah blah blah'
Of course, there's no need really for any kind of movie except to entertain people.

Good sequels are the exception, not the rule. While the occassional successful follow-up slips out, a majority of them just can't match up to what made the movie in the first place. And when a sequel DOES do well, it just prompts the release of even weaker follow-up sequels. The two recent Star Wars movies, Alien 3-4, Terminator 3, Die Hard 3, Matrix Revolutions, Harry Potter 3, Batman Forever/Batman & Robin are all examples of movie series are going in the wrong direction... and these are all major film franchises. Imagine the gambles a sleeper hit like BE would have to take.

And a prequel is nothing more than a sequel in reverse. A second movie based on the original premise, but only earlier in time... sounds like a sequel to me.

you have a point about all those movies but there are some that are awsome. LOTR (well kind of), spiderman 2 and others.

blackc@t has a point, i think it would be awsum as