A law agaisn't rated "M" video games.

I don't. But if I did I would not put blame on video games and retailers. It would be my responsobility as a parent to monitor what my children are watching/playing.

I have no problem with retailers not selling M rated games to children. This has been going on for quite some time, and it should be going on. But they should not force M rated games to be in a completely different area "not unlike pornography" just because they're M rated. That is going to hurt the video game indunstry and is an obvious attempt at stopping violent and M rated video games. And mark my words, more "laws" will come, and it will continue to hurt the video game industry.

can't argue against that. Sound statement BF.

BOOOO! Link gives up too easily! 😛 jerry

Movies has it.
Whats the difference if videogames has it?

I dont think its going to stop M rated games. M rated game are now the biggest sellers in the industry. Developers are not going to stop making them, so why worried. The law only stops some 10 year old kid from buying a M rated game. And some m rated games are not very good for a 10 year old kid.

Films have a similiar thing. ANd you still see R rated movies still. So that didnt go away.

Originally posted by WindDancer
Is for California mostly check it out:

http://www.gamespot.com/news/2004/09/21/news_6108135.html

So I guess this means that if I sell my games to a minor, and one of them is rated "M" I'm breaking the law. That sucks!

Why do these people have agaisn't video games?

they have that law here too