Kill Bill 1/Kill Bill 2.....WHY?

Started by saltym1 pages

Kill Bill 1/Kill Bill 2.....WHY?

Why did Tarantino, release kill bill in 2 movies, why did he not just edit some parts out of the first one, (the long winded hattori hanzo scene) and stick it together with kill bill vol2, and made it a 3 hour and a bit movie epic, and call it simply KILL BILL,,,,,,,,,,,,and he would have made one of the greatest movies of the decade.....yet here we are, with 2 movies..........and it kind of lacks something. Here's hoping they get round to releasing a back to back version on DVD.

I personally thought they should have combined both of them into zero movies.

Re: Kill Bill 1/Kill Bill 2.....WHY?

Originally posted by saltym
Why did Tarantino, release kill bill in 2 movies, why did he not just edit some parts out of the first one, (the long winded hattori hanzo scene) and stick it together with kill bill vol2, and made it a 3 hour and a bit movie epic, and call it simply KILL BILL,,,,,,,,,,,,and he would have made one of the greatest movies of the decade.....yet here we are, with 2 movies..........and it kind of lacks something. Here's hoping they get round to releasing a back to back version on DVD.
In one sentence: it was too long.

So "the good, bad and the ugly" is too long is it................or perhaps "Once upon a time in America"

theres nothing wrong with a long film...........if its good

you know it would help if there was somebody on here to talk too who had an iQ that was bigger than your average fencepost.

Originally posted by saltym

you know it would help if there was somebody on here to talk too who had an iQ that was bigger than your average fencepost.

That's a tall order, but to be honest, with pathetic analogies such as that, coupled with the fact you didn't post this in the entire forum devoted to Quentin Tarantino, I can't say you're much better?

Welcome to KMC.

Use the kill Bill and Tarantino Forum.