Mr. ZeroHowever - the media fed nationalistic propaganda that you see everywhere has (it seems to me) brainwashed a great deal of the population to the extent that they can't think objectively about the things the government does in their name.
Then please DON'T say America. Refer specifically to the US government, Bush, or the US media. The reason I took offense is because to me America is representative of all that is American: people and history. Tony Blair gets the blame when it comes to British involvement, yet AMERICA gets blamed when it comes to U.S. involvement and not Bush. If you hate our government, point that out instead of America. And if you've read my post, my address was mainly in defense of America not BUSH.
However, the media didn't brainwash anything. If anything, it's Bush and his administration.
Forgive me for saying this, but thats a typical example of what we mean - before the war Saddam was linked with al qaeda and producing WOMD ... Now that this has been discredited alternative retroactive justification is being used. And the American response? "Hell - who cares WHY we did it- it's done". The only nation with factual and proven self admitted WOMD and a history of terrorism in the name of politics is in fact the USA.And you wonder why we shake our heads?
Don't know where you're getting that quote about us not CARING. Obviously we do since they're has been large numbers of protest/demonstration. HOWEVER, did YOU know & the PUBLIC OF YOUR COUNTRY & MEDIA (not your government) know that there wasn't WMD or an Al Qaeda link to Saddam BEFORE THE WAR? It's easy to criticize America and say all this afterwards, but did YOU yourself know or YOUR PUBLIC know? If you didn't, wouldn't you say that it would've been easy for your government and media to slowly feed you this information that Saddam had WMD and Al Qaeda was link to Saddam. (Also note that the US intelligence reported that there was evidence between Saddam and Al Qaeda. So is America not suppose to believe in our own intelligence. Or should we have believed France, who had economic treaties with Saddam's Iraq?) Additionally, what should we do now? Leave?
And it's Bush and his administration that's trying to dodge the fact that there isn't WMD destroying.
America has WMD but so does France, Britain, and others. However, we aren't going after them nor is France or Britain going after us because neither side has threatened to nuke other nations if we didn't get what we wanted. If any of these democratic nations tried to, the people would storm the capital and drag that elected official out of office and put them on trial. To carry out a nuke attack, they would also need the willingness of those around them, which I highly doubt would be willing too, and you know that.
You KNOW that if Bush, Chirac, or Blair wanted to nuke another country, they'd never be able to or would get away with it if they for some reason was able to launch a nuke. However, if Saddam or Kim Jung Il wanted to nuke another country, you think the people would have the power to over throw them - or even oppose their will? If we were dangerous, the UN would've gone after any of these countries. Thing is, America, France, and Britain are not LIKELY going to nuke another country unless it's our only option. Can you really say the same about North Korea or Iraq, possibly even Iran?
Yes, the world would be a better place without these weapons, but non of these countries are willing to give it up. And since this is the case, would you rather nukes be in the hands of countries with elected officials or psychopathic dictators who care nothing about their people & no one who can SUCCESSFULLY oppose the governments control? Would you rather give a gun to a cop (who you know can atleast try to keep the peace) or hand it to a criminal - who you know won't give a DAMN about people's lives? If you HAD to pick one, which would you rather pick? (And no, I'm not saying America is the worlds police.)
You must be right - America is desperately seeking help from the UN to police the mess its made in Iraq. Crawling for help is something the US know a little about.
Funny. Thing is, Bush is crawling to the UN because the American public NOW knows alot of what he said was shit. Election is also coming up and so he's busting his ass to ask for help - as that's what the American public WANTS. Hell, even BEFORE the war, American's wanted Bush to get other nations involved in dealing with Iraq. America isn't crawling, it's Bush and his administration. 😉
Zelda LestatAnd yes, America is a bully.We are considered a 'super power' in the world because of oure industrial wealth, yes,but our interfernce with other countries only makes things worse the majority of the time, yet the government keeps interfering,when obviously it isnt helping anything.
We ARE a super power. It's not US who are claiming this; a fact is a fact. The world ITSELF considers us a super power as they considered the Soviet Union a super power. It's not just industrial wealth, if so than Japan, Germany, Great Britain, France, etc. would be considered a super power. It's the fact that our military power stretches beyond our land; our missiles can reach other nations; our aircraft carrier can project our power anywhere in the world; we're the only nation to have trident submarines that can nuke any country if they were to attack mainland America; our natural resources are more abundant compared to others.
And if our governments didn't interfere, Hitler and Facism would've conquered most of the world or the Soviet Union and communism would've. If we didn't interfere in Yugoslovia, the genocide of muslims would've suceeded. Where was most of Europe when this genocide happened in their part of the world?
Isolationism got us nowhere...but Pearl Harbor and the extension of WWI and WWII.