Science vs Religion

Originally posted by BaptizedAtheist
We have concrete proofs on science, when religion clearly only is VERY popular fiction... Only my opinion, through😉

concrete proof? Science is always concrete fact untill it is proven wrong, remember the Solid State Universe? That didn't last long...

Its proven facutal to the best of our ability at any given time. Which is all that fact is.

Originally posted by Alliance
Its proven facutal to the best of our ability at any given time. Which is all that fact is.

Then in that case nothing is concrete fact...evolution isn't FACT, it is theory, Big Bang isn't FACT, it is theory, same with Intelligent Design, Creation, the Teleological Argument and so on and so on. The idea that science is in conflict is rubbish. Science does NOT pass judgement on something unless there is evidence. It cannot provide judgement on God, because it doesn't have enough data either way!

God you people, making atheists defend religion!

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav

God you people, making atheists defend religion!

Quote of the month

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Then in that case nothing is concrete fact...evolution isn't FACT, it is theory, Big Bang isn't FACT, it is theory, same with Intelligent Design, Creation, the Teleological Argument and so on and so on.

No, not the same. Creationism, Intelligent Design, the Teleological Argument, et all are not science, but theology.

Originally posted by Machete_Guy
In the end, who do you think will win?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Then in that case nothing is concrete fact...evolution isn't FACT, it is theory, Big Bang isn't FACT, it is theory, same with Intelligent Design, Creation, the Teleological Argument and so on and so on. The idea that science is in conflict is rubbish. Science does NOT pass judgement on something unless there is evidence. It cannot provide judgement on God, because it doesn't have enough data either way!

God you people, making atheists defend religion!

So are gravity and electricity. Whats your point?

Naivity will always exist. So will belief in storys like God.

Sad, but true... Yet, it fascinates me that some people lives be these means...

So belief is kinda a good thing, as it helps a lot of people...

But God doesn't exist. That's fact.

So science wins

Originally posted by BaptizedAtheist
But God doesn't exist. That's fact.

🙄

If you can't prove God exists... He don't exists🙂
We have never heards from him. If i says something exists where you can't prove otherwise, it doesn't makes it true.

Originally posted by BaptizedAtheist
If you can't prove God exists... He don't exists🙂
We have never heards from him. If i says something exists where you can't prove otherwise, it doesn't makes it true.

I see you've moved up in the world Judge. Anyway I'll maintain the joke that you're a real debator.

You cannot prove that something does not exist unless you are either omnipotent or omniscient.

Honestly, in the case of Bigfoot that's the assumption people take. A matter of fact and a matter of faith are entirely different.

Otherwise, people tend to say that everything is true and you wouldn't be able to say otherwise although it hasn't happened. You can't say I'm a murderer until it happens, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that anyone can be a murderer.

God is not about proof. It's about faith. That's another league of discussion.

Originally posted by chithappens
Honestly, in the case of Bigfoot that's the assumption people take.

Which happens to be a valid position. An unsupportable position but still a valid one.

Originally posted by chithappens
A matter of fact and a matter of faith are entirely different

Yeah . . .

Originally posted by Machete_Guy
In the end, who do you think will win?

Many people have the misconception that science and the Bible are incompatible, antithetical, or contradictory. But the truth is that science confirms the Bible. As a result, there is no win/loss relationship between the two.

Originally posted by Alliance
So are gravity and electricity. Whats your point?

Science does not attempt to prove or disprove God.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Many people have the misconception that science and the Bible are incompatible, antithetical, or contradictory. But the truth is that science confirms the Bible. As a result, there is no win/loss relationship between the two.

Are you referring to the agenda motivating science of the likes of Simcha Jacobovici?

Perhaps you could enlighten us to these fields of science that illuminate bible verse or religious doctrine?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Science does not attempt to prove or disprove God.

Yes. I know.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Are you referring to the agenda motivating science of the likes of Simcha Jacobovici?

Perhaps you could enlighten us to these fields of science that illuminate bible verse or religious doctrine?

Peruse the contents found in this link.

http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Peruse the contents found in this link.

http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml

I said you. Don't give us some shit link to some shit website you've found out there that is totally biased and established by the nut jobs that attend your weekly meetings. Explain it to us yourself. No page long quotes from your websites. Just you, your mind and your keyboard. Can you do that? Do I need to write it in blue to get you to understand what I'm asking?

Originally posted by Alliance
Yes. I know.

Yes, of course you do your a scientist, I'm talking to other posters.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Peruse the contents found in this link.

http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/science.shtml