Villain For Spider-Man 3?

Started by NoFate007297 pages

I think you should differentiate between Hob and Green Goblin for the people that keep saying they'd want to see Harry as Hob, otherwise they take a guess and they're right no matter what lol

Originally posted by chucktaylor
Agreed.

And oh yeah, Ultimate, I'm male.

Lets keep it like that. 🙂

But I dont think Mysterio would be ina movie anymore because he was in the SM 2 game. WOuldnt that be too hassle for the game creators as well as Raimi? Becuase after all, the game IS an official liscenced product of the movie.

well the green goblin was in the sp1 game and he was also in the movie...but your probably right. I dont care if Mysterios in it or not, I just dont want topher grace to be eddie brock...Topher Grace vs Tobey Mcguire, ya thatd be an awesome fight.

-evil seed youre group idea sucks...any Goblin will definately be a villain, so its debating which goblin, and the 3rd villain

Originally posted by spencerspider
yea mysterio is sorta boring

Not really. Just there are better villains than him

Mysterio is a great villain.

Better than Sandman IMO.

ya Mysterio has a better plotline than Sandman

Originally posted by Drache53
That's where you're wrong: Raimi changed a lot of things in SM1. The word organics mean anything to you?

I said he didn't change ALOT of things and organics were included in the things he changed so stop trying to prove someone wrong.I know Spidey's history,I know he makes his own webbing.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Mysterio is a great villain.

Better than Sandman IMO.

Come to think of it,that's actually true.

But the Kingpin RULES ALL!! 😄

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
Come to think of it,that's actually true.

But the Kingpin RULES ALL!! 😄

I can't remember the last time Kingpin fought Spider-Man in the comics.

When it comes to the big bad guys of Spider-Man,Kingpin ain't in the top three.Heck he's not even in the top five.

He was used way too much in the cartoon too.I got sick of him.

Do you guys think, since Mary Jane is in these plays now, that Mysterio will have a small part in SP3? I mean i think having a sweet special effect scene with him would be pretty cool........

Originally posted by TrAGiC KiD
Do you guys think, since Mary Jane is in these plays now, that Mysterio will have a small part in SP3? I mean i think having a sweet special effect scene with him would be pretty cool........

I completely didn't even think about that...good observation man. I don't know if that'll happen but that's something cool to consider, maybe even a cameo or something you know?

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
I said he didn't change ALOT of things and organics were included in the things he changed so stop trying to prove someone wrong.I know Spidey's history,I know he makes his own webbing.

No, you said the only thing he changed in SM1 was Goblin's costume. You said he changed a lot of things in SM2. Here's what you said:

"In SM-1 Raimi did a perfect job but the only thing he changed was the Goblin's costume.In SM-2 alot of things were changed but overall it was still a great movie."

Edit: Oh, and I wasn't trying to prove you wrong, I was correcting you. If Mr. Parker had seen that post, you'd have been torn to shreds by now.

for someone that mentioned Mysterio wouldnt fit in...Electro wouldnt either. I dont know what conflict Electro would represent but i dunno Mysterio's either.

And what conflict is Sandman going to give that Mysterio or Electro couldn't???

Originally posted by Doc Ock
And what conflict is Sandman going to give that Mysterio or Electro couldn't???

Sandman is like a road block...a wall, Peter parker has an early mid life crisis.

Mysterio would be paranoia probably...about parker losing mj by means of her being killed by Spidey's enemies

electro: i dunno

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Mysterio is a great villain.

Better than Sandman IMO.

Originally posted by Silverstein
Sandman is like a road block...a wall, Peter parker has an early mid life crisis.

He already had that in SM-2 when he lost his powers.And it had nothing to do with a villain.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
He already had that in SM-2 when he lost his powers.And it had nothing to do with a villain.

ok, sandman has no purpose i give up

Originally posted by Drache53
No, you said the only thing he changed in SM1 was Goblin's costume. You said he changed a lot of things in SM2. Here's what you said:

"In SM-1 Raimi did a perfect job but the only thing he changed was the Goblin's costume.In SM-2 alot of things were changed but overall it was still a great movie."

Edit: Oh, and I wasn't trying to prove you wrong, I was correcting you. If Mr. Parker had seen that post, you'd have been torn to shreds by now.

Actually,I remember why I didn't add the organic webshooters to that post,because I thought that they were as good as the webshooters.Also,you don't have to correct me,I know what I said.

web shooters and organics, the web shooters show that peter parker is intelligent, and if there were web shooter/cartridges at would affect spiderman drastically. He'd have to modify it for special villains like Electro, or something. If he ran out of webbing he'd have to sort of dodge and joke his way out....etc

So we've established that Sandman has no coherent point in the movie.. lol

Edit: Besides being a villain.