Villain For Spider-Man 3?

Started by Doc Ock297 pages

I wouldn't say picking.I'd say he and Sam were pushing for Sandman to be used.

ya he isnt picking he just said this was his fav villain i think and sam loves sandman and trust me carnage will not be featured in any movie

I haven't been here in a while...so any who...agood friend of mine said he read someplace that it was lizard venom and hobgoblin.

ive read that tht was a long time ago right after spiderman 2 came out it is fake there r not gonna be 3 villains

😑

Originally posted by Spideys Sister
I haven't been here in a while...so any who...agood friend of mine said he read someplace that it was lizard venom and hobgoblin.

Thats a possiblity.

no its not all three of them? that would be a 3 hour movie.harry wouldnt take long to become goblin maybe 5-10 min.connors might take 10-15.but u have to introduce symbiote and eddie brock and u symbiote hates peer and then have venom and all 3 fighting even if they had just 2 fights each it would be too long.if they did venom by himself they could probably get only one fight scene with venom in it.

I don't think it will be a three hour movie, but you never know with the end of a trilogy.

nah he will stick to the 2 hour and 10-15 min or just a little longer

No way will the movie be 3 hours.

2 hours and 20 minutes maximum.

ya thats what i said practically

Yeah but you never know Lord of the Rings 3 was a really long movie.

A spidey movie that long, what would be good in it for that long.

al of the lord of the movies in lotr were like 3 hrs.spiderman 3 would never be that long so dont even think about it

thank god

Why wont it be that long? What makes you think its impossible for a SpiderMan film to be 3 hours long? Whats the difference between it and other movies? I think it would be cool for it to be that long it would help to put more stuff in there and make the possible two characters their potential best.

no it wont be 3 hours long.no one wants to sit through 3 hurs of Spiderman.Lord of the Rings was all action this aint.Anyway ill bet my life it aint more than 2 hr 30 min

Well maybe not but you dont know that for sure. Where is it written? Plus I would much rather sit through 3 hours of SpiderMan over lord of the rings anyday. So I guess im nobody eh?Anyways it really dont matter so stop crying about it and either way trust that it will be great like the other films, no matter how long it is. And good bet, 2 hours 30 min vs. 3 hours. What, half hour difference? Aint nothing man. Damn, sorry for the really long post guys. Said what I had to though in ONE POST THIS TIME!lol

Half hour is a lot of difference, and chances are they won't make it 3 hours. However, there's always a slight possibility, however small it may be. I'd love to see a 3 hour Spider-Man movie but ONLY if it wasn't full of pointless filler scenes. I think they should just cut a movie to the artistic reality and then say "oh, its this long...ok". But, you know, marketing and producers and all that...

Well ok yall like to shoot me down huh-lol- but a half hour is a large difference in that a lot of things can happen but not in a way that its too much to sit down for that period of time. 30 mins difference really aint that much in that sense, but I guess its really a matter of opinion and obviously everyone doesnt agree with mine-sob Nah nothin personal I know but I agree with everything else NoFate said

ps Guess that was two posts lol